Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein
The real story is not what's in the article but the fact that DNC official mouthpieces like the New York Times and Washington Post are starting to raise these sort of questions at all instead of running interference for her, as would be expected if her grip on the party were as secure as she'd have the public believe.

One can only imagine the behind-the-scenes maneuvering going on. Really, the only thing Hillary has going for is the threat to take down as many others with her (starting with Obama) if she's brought down. That's the only calculus that will matter between know and the convention. The D angst is whether they can force her out with minimal damage or have to acquiesce to her going down in flames in the general and try to salvage what they can for the next 4 or 8 years under Trump.

63 posted on 05/28/2016 6:37:45 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: AustinBill

I always thought that the Clintons threatened everyone around them - they have all the FBI files, after all, and have probably looked at the most recent and updated ones. Charming couple - sort of like the Goebbels.


64 posted on 05/28/2016 8:58:45 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson