This is ridiculous. She shouldn’t have to do any time. She wasn’t even there. Civil charges are another thing.
Wimped out society wants to always blame others. He was 15, not 5 years old.
I don’t know that she wasn’t there. She says so but she also says she found the kid dead and bailed on the scene because she was worried about herself. I’m saying it seems she’s not a reliable character. Do others say she was there and supplied the alcohol? Story doesn’t say. But I doubt she’s getting 20 years on the basis of “kids got drunk in her house while she was away and one died”. Sounds like there’s more to it.