Seems like after 10 years it would be really easy to compare some of the predictions in the film (as mentioned only briefly in passing in the article) to the reality 10 years down the road. Would have been a relatively simple "look how eerily accurate his predictions turned out to be" or "look how far off the mark he was" but the inquiring minds at Today chose not to go there. Hmm, I wonder why.
Yes, the vague reference to his book just proves the media perpetuates the big lie.