Replies

You are either the kind of person who says things he doesn’t mean, or you’re used to interacting with people who say things they don’t mean. I’m not that kind. I said, with crystsl clarity, that there is nothing to discuss, at this point in time, with the type of person who runs around labeling people “Trumpnuts.” I said it more than once. I meant it.

If we were to continue this conversation, it would be, as per my previous post, a few years into Trump’s term—God willing he has one. I’m making no commitment, however, to resume this discussion even then. Rather, your inability to read and comprehend what I wrote, or your unwillingness to respect it, terminates the exchange. Communication is a two way street, and so far you’ve demonstrated a need to talk coupled with an unwillingness or inability to listen. That precludes communication.

If all that weren’t enough, there’s the ‘Trumpnut’ silliness itself. If you enjoy such immature sobriquets, that’s your preference. Why you’d imagine anyone would want to converse with someone who calls them a nut is a mystery. Most people have better ways to spend their time.

Since you mean what you say, then you actually believe Trump will cut 100,000s of government jobs? Further, do you base this belief that he will do so on the fact that he is businessman? My disagreement with those statements then means you believe I know exactly squat...” You made no effort to explain your statements but resorted to ad hominem attacks me.

You describe me as an angry teenager and claim I know “exactly squat about businessmen and how successful business execs operate”. Then you go on to describe me as Cruz supporter which you will prove by digging into my previous posts. Having failed at pinning Cruz on me you resort to my use of “Trumpnuts” as if it bolsters your case for the assertions you made and restated by me in the first paragraph above.

You speak with such clarity that I heard you both times you said you would not discuss this further.