Could be a wing; that would be a bomb in the fuel there. But that is harder to get to and the fuel is much more protected than people think. It would also require a mechanic with a lot of know-how to get something in there. And greater chance of detection, since inspectors come along after.
The tail is more likely, IMHO, in that it’s weaker and that is where the storage area for thing loaded onto the plane by airport staff (e.g., food/drinks) are.
Any control surface (tail or wing) loss would give you roughly the same effect.
Mr. GG2’s daughter, SIL and 3 grandkids live in France. They don’t understand why we won’t fly over to visit. LOL!
Could be a wing; that would be a bomb in the fuel there. But that is harder to get to and the fuel is much more protected than people think. It would also require a mechanic with a lot of know-how to get something in there. And greater chance of detection, since inspectors come along after.
The tail is more likely, IMHO, in that it’s weaker and that is where the storage area for thing loaded onto the plane by airport staff (e.g., food/drinks) are.
Any control surface (tail or wing) loss would give you roughly the same effect.
_____________________
Well if in the US the airport worked badge in and out without scrutiny then it probably happens elsewhere. a badge means nothing,