To: jazusamo
“If ‘the right of the people to keep and bear arms’ is to have any force, the people must have a right to acquire the very firearms they are entitled to keep and to bear,” Judge O'Scannlain wrote in the 34-page opinion for the majority. “One cannot truly enjoy a constitutionally protected right when the State is permitted to snuff out the means by which he exercises it; one cannot keep arms when the State prevents him from purchasing them.” Surprised this bit of logic made it out of the 9th Circuit.
Of course liberals don't want "the right of the people to keep and bears arms" to have any force.
16 posted on
05/16/2016 5:32:41 PM PDT by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: libertylover
18 posted on
05/16/2016 5:40:31 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: libertylover
>>>>in the 34-page opinion for the majority<<<<
It takes 34 Pages to explain “Shall Not Be Infringed”?
20 posted on
05/16/2016 5:49:02 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Hillary Clinton has killed four more People than Three Mile Island.)
To: libertylover
“Surprised this bit of logic made it out of the 9th Circuit.”
A three-judge 9th Circuit panel struck down California’s “may issue” CCW law two years ago, but now it’s in an eleven ‘just us” En Banc, which is probably where this wlll go too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson