IIRC, the honduran supreme court ruled that President Zelaya had violated the constitution by trying to overturn term limits for the president of Honduras. The military stepped in, removed Zelaya from power and then deported him and turned the presidency over to the next in line according to the Honduran constitution. I believe the Honduran Supreme Court also ruled that the military needed to remove Zelaya.
I also remember the US Library of Congress coming to the conclusion that actually everything that happened was completely legal and the correct procedure under the Honduran Constitution with the exception of deporting the president.
So I am uncertain what the underlying complaint is about Hillary’s involvement in Honduras. It appears that the complaint is Hillary was attempting to help Honduras hold up its constitution.
Unfortunately, I have no reason to believe she will uphold ours.
That’s an interesting view you share with Clinton.
The rest of the world disagreed, and called it what it was, which was a US-backed military coup.