Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill [With Updates]
Conservative Review ^ | May 12, 2016 | Daniel Horowitz

Posted on 05/13/2016 8:32:22 AM PDT by Da Bilge Troll

Pregnant, female, Navy SEALs was something many of us used to joke about as a way of exaggerating the absurd social engineering in the military. Yet, placing women in special operations and direct combat units has now become a reality under the Obama-led Pentagon. Sadly, not only have Republicans like John McCain refused to use their perches on the Armed Services Committees in the House and Senate to block this social engineering, they are now codifying it with a provision that could lead to a mandatory draft of all women. Earlier this week, I noted that the final House version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) contained a provision for the first time ever including young women in the requirement to register for Selective Service. However, this provision was only added because of a strategic mistake of the committee chairman who thought the members would vote down this absurdity. He was just trying to make a point. John McCain, on the other hand, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, deliberately placed that provision in his chairman's mark of the NDAA, according to a Senate staffer.

I am further told by Senate staff that it is unlikely an amendment to strike this provision will even succeed on the floor of the Senate, which means a majority of that body now supports drafting women. The only hope to stop this is on the House floor. Have we gone mad as a society?

Any vestige of GOP opposition to Democrat social transformation is now gone. There is no floor. Battle lines that used to hold for decades are now plowed through by Democrats in a matter of one committee markup. A party that stands for nothing, indeed.

Update: A Summary of the NDAA from McCain's office defends the provision to include women in Selective Service as follows: "Because the Department of Defense has lifted the ban on women serving in ground combat units, the committee believes there is no further justification in limiting the duty to register under the Military Selective Service Act to men." Thus, McCain believes that because a few liberal social groups and Obama's politically appointed generals want to include women in combat on a voluntary basis, the Senate should therefore require all women to potentially register for the draft. And instead of debating this earth shattering social transformation publicly in a standalone bill, McCain decided to slip in the provision to a 1,000-page bill authorizing all defense programs.

Another disturbing provision in this bill establishes an independent National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service. The commission is tasked with, among other things, to "consider how to foster a sense of service and civic responsibility among the nation's youth, improve military recruiting, and increase the pool of qualified applicants for military service and their propensity to serve." While this provision sounds innocuous, some conservatives might be concerned that given McCain's long record of support for Americorps and other public service programs, he will use this program to compel young adults (now including women) into some sort of public service.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), who sits on the Armed Services Committee, was so vehemently opposed to this provision that he voted against the underlying bill. In a statement provided to Conservative Review, the Texas senator noted that although the committee adopted 12 of his amendments related to an array of foreign policy and national security issues, he could not "in good conscience vote to draft our daughters into the military, sending them off to war and forcing them into combat." "I will continue my efforts to speak out against the effort to force America's daughter into combat," wrote the former presidential candidate in a statement.

Update: Sens. Mike Lee and Deb Fischer also voted against final passage. Sen. Lee called this provision "misguided and ill-advised" in a statement he released tonight. He also opposed the bill because it continues the program funding the Syrian rebels. "The bill authorizes the continuation of the Syria Train and Equip program, which was suspended last year after expending hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money to train only four or five fighters and finance the purchase of weapons that were ultimately seized by Al Nusra, the Syrian Al Qaeda affiliate," wrote Lee. "I firmly believe that the American counter-ISIS strategy must be reconsidered from the top-down and that we should not fund failing programs."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 114th; arizona; conscription; draft; john; johnmccain; mccain; militarywomen; scum; senatorjohnmccain; senatormccain; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: nevergore

Sure they will-—just ‘water’ the qualifications down, so we wind up with nothing worthwhile—


41 posted on 05/13/2016 9:39:49 AM PDT by cmomm44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll

“...McCain believes that because a few liberal social groups and Obama’s politically appointed generals want to include women in combat on a voluntary basis, the Senate should therefore require all women to potentially register for the draft.”

I do not like McCain. But I think he is doing it to underscore a point and embarrass the Dems who lifted restrictions vs women in combat positions. If they are now eligible for combat then so too should they be eligible for the draft.How will the Dems respond to that?


42 posted on 05/13/2016 9:41:51 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll

He thinks he can ride to another victory by riding Trump’s coattails then continues on in his 99.44% Democrat way of doing things....priceless.


43 posted on 05/13/2016 9:51:59 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll

McCain must want his twinkie eating daughter to pull her weight.


44 posted on 05/13/2016 9:53:37 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Not sure what your point is. Israel has always been socially leftist.


45 posted on 05/13/2016 9:53:44 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Your use of personal insults only goes to show that your argument has no merit.


46 posted on 05/13/2016 10:08:21 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

>>>Not sure what your point is. Israel has always been socially leftist<<<

Didn’t have a point, just reacting to your original Statement that a country that uses Women to fight for it isn’t worth fighting for.

I just pointed out that Israel is an exception to your way of thinking. They are a small Nation and need every able bodied person to protect themselves.

Are you now saying Israel isn’t worth fighting for because they are socially Leftist?


47 posted on 05/13/2016 10:08:41 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary Clinton has killed four more People than Three Mile Island.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44; JohnMcCain
I hate Juan, but this makes sense. If women are going to be on the front lines and in Special Forces, then they can be conscripts. Otherwise it’s a.double standard.

Ah the old double standard argument...But is John McCain's daughter going to be drafted?

Or just everyone else's?
48 posted on 05/13/2016 10:16:06 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

Sorry if you took it as an insult but I spoke the truth. You are a feminist. That’s simply a fact. The feminist agenda includes extending the draft to women. You agree with that agenda. By definition that makes you a feminist. If the truth hurts, I apologize but I deal in reality.


49 posted on 05/13/2016 10:18:19 AM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll

He’s despicable.


50 posted on 05/13/2016 10:19:10 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

lol it hurts not at all since I realize (and you probably do too) how ridiculous it is


51 posted on 05/13/2016 10:20:56 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

The historical legal justification was that women could not serve in combat units. That was affirmed by the supreme court, IIRC.


52 posted on 05/13/2016 10:25:22 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MortMan; WilliamIII
The historical legal justification was that women could not serve in combat units. That was affirmed by the supreme court, IIRC.

I agree with that completely...women should be drafted to do the maintenance, administrative and medical jobs, freeing more men for combat...but they should IN NO OTHER WAY be exempted from service any more than men.
53 posted on 05/13/2016 10:30:13 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

McCain is a jerk and so is his lame daughter and her lousy radio show.


54 posted on 05/13/2016 10:34:04 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

Consider that being drafted as a man then becomes automatic assignment to combat, as opposed to the hope of getting a non-combat billet.

Under current interpretations of equality, that would itself be discriminatory.

And, the change to the combat integration plan for the military means that the explicit reason for the female draft exemption has been removed.

The main issue I have is that the feminists want to be able to do everything, but do not want to be forced to do it like men. Yes, it is madness to put women in combat IMO, but it is also madness to pretend that women are exactly equal only when it benefits the women over the men.


55 posted on 05/13/2016 10:34:50 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

That stupid bastard. After the torture he went through he wants to expose our sisters and daughters to that and worse! This country has gone completely mad with political correctness.

Pass your bill you insane old douche bag, I’ll send my daughter to Canada or shed blood before I let you place her in combat.


56 posted on 05/13/2016 10:37:03 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

Live in your own reality if it’s the only way you can cope

But I can’t humor you, sorry. You and McCain have bought the feminist ideology. Honesty requires me to admit you’re a feminist, even if you take it as an insult. Just like, because he has man parts, I have to call Bruce Jenner a man even though he says he’s not. For me, reality rules


57 posted on 05/13/2016 10:38:15 AM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: patlin

That sounds like the language of anti-semitism. These so-called “one-world zionists” are largely against Israel


58 posted on 05/13/2016 10:40:59 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Even Israel does not put women in frontline combat roles.

They tried it once, briefly. Learned it was impractical for a whole host of reasons, and have never tried it again.


59 posted on 05/13/2016 10:43:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Israel is not really a mobile force that is deployed around the world.

They are pretty much border patrol and emergency services.


60 posted on 05/13/2016 10:44:40 AM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (I think I'm the RiNO - George Will and Bill Kristol say I can't be part of their club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson