Liar.
I gave you evidence and reasoning multiple times.
I QUOTE:
“But posting at all hours of the day plus repeated talking points plus only showing up during the election season plus eventually opusing out or getting banned while claiming that they’re supporting Hillary does kind of lend itself to that hypothesis, am I right?”
That’s evidence. That’s reasoning.
You might not like it; you may not agree with it, but that’s both evidence and reasoning.
Therefore.
L. I. A. R.
Or you just didn’t read my earlier posts.
End of story.
Enjoy your ribs.
Something “lending itself” to a hypothesis does not make it so.
I understand, it boosts your sense of importance to state such things.
Fact is and fact remains.. you got nothing on nobody.
Rave on, rant on, but know that in reality... you got nothin’.
Cheers.
That's called a logical fallacy, specifically a hasty generalization. Look it up.
Perdogg was not a paid troll. He spent significant time helping me with the SCOTUS ping list.
Liar.
L. I. A. R.
Argumentum ad hominem.