To: Luircin; humblegunner
But posting at all hours of the day plus repeated talking points plus only showing up during the election season plus eventually opusing out or getting banned while claiming that theyre supporting Hillary does kind of lend itself to that hypothesis, am I right? That's called a logical fallacy, specifically a hasty generalization. Look it up.
Perdogg was not a paid troll. He spent significant time helping me with the SCOTUS ping list.
Liar.
L. I. A. R.
Argumentum ad hominem.
63 posted on
05/11/2016 10:04:49 AM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: BuckeyeTexan
I don’t remember ever talking with Perdogg.
Whatever the case, I was done with this conversation yesterday.
64 posted on
05/11/2016 10:20:39 AM PDT by
Luircin
(Stomp Hillary, build wall, stop Islam. Any of the above are good reasons to vote. Trump 2016)
To: BuckeyeTexan
(And besides, did Perdogg claim that he was going to vote for Hillary and post maybe twice before going on an anti-Trump screed?)
65 posted on
05/11/2016 11:06:26 AM PDT by
Luircin
(Stomp Hillary, build wall, stop Islam. Any of the above are good reasons to vote. Trump 2016)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson