[blueunicorn6]

Gosh.

There’s nothing I enjoy more than having a word debate on Free Republic.

Thank you for coming onto a thread of Hillary Clinton’s actions and trying to parse words with me about what “espionage” means.

Let’s see what the FBI comes up with.

As of now, no one can be sure that Hillary wasn’t a filthy spy selling us out to our enemies for money.

Spies using “drops” can also claim they were just throwing away paper or photos. Leaving our nation’s secrets on an unguarded computer system may be the same as running a “drop”.

Thanks again for your unsolicited and inaccurate comments.

[justlurking]

As of now, no one can be sure that Hillary wasn’t a filthy spy selling us out to our enemies for money.

And as of now, no one can be sure that you aren't a dog posting on the Internet. See how that works?

You won't win any arguments by making that claim. But, you can make the point that the law makes gross negligence a crime, and that Clinton signed a document agreeing she could be prosecuted for it.

There's prima facie evidence for negligence -- we don't have to wait for the FBI. There's circumstantial evidence for laundering bribes through the Clinton Foundation. But, there's no public evidence of espionage.