Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1

Of course you wouldn’t see anything wrong. Odd, they didn’t excise anything else. In your simplistic liberal brain, what do you think is going on?

What? You think it is a simple coinincidence?

Of course you don’t. You know full well what is going on, but you are too much of a coward to be truthful, because that would expose you for what you are.

But I wouldn’t worry, if I were you. Everyone can already see full well what you are.


36 posted on 05/02/2016 7:12:17 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

It’s a editorial decision by the producers of 30 for 30, not a decision by Congress, the president, or the Supreme Court. Bloody sock or not, it will not be detrimental to the country.

Now if there are people that object to the sock not being in the documentary, they are free to produce a documentary that includes the bloody sock incident.


38 posted on 05/02/2016 7:24:12 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson