I see nothing political about an allegedly bloody sock.
And being that an ESPN episode of 30 for 30 is not a vital nor even relevant historical document or production, the a absence of Schilling’s sock is not a purge of history.
Of course you wouldn’t see anything wrong. Odd, they didn’t excise anything else. In your simplistic liberal brain, what do you think is going on?
What? You think it is a simple coinincidence?
Of course you don’t. You know full well what is going on, but you are too much of a coward to be truthful, because that would expose you for what you are.
But I wouldn’t worry, if I were you. Everyone can already see full well what you are.