Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Well, you're not banned....

Well, no mail and prior approval of all posts. For example, I have no way of knowing if this will appear or not.

and many times it's the way things are said.

I honestly still don't know what it was, but that's fine. My view of the internet has always been that the people who own/run websites have the right to make their own rules.

I was just pointing out that there is discipline of some kind being handed out, and I'm not sure the lines are clear for those who wish to continue making substantive posts.

202 posted on 05/02/2016 2:28:59 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

[[I was just pointing out that there is discipline of some kind being handed out, and I’m not sure the lines are clear for those who wish to continue making substantive posts.

The point is, I believed I was on the right side of the line, and found out otherwise. I would suggest that those who wish to continue posting here be aware that you can get banned/suspended, or whatever even if you don’t say you’re not voting for Trump.]]

Thank you for posting and backing up what I’ve said about some folks who were not ‘nevertrump, and did not ‘buck up against the owner’ being banned or like you severely restricted- - and like Bat Lady said- others have also met the same fate, and are unsure why- and this was my opinion when reading through the posts and previous posts of some of those who were banned- Those defending all the bans claiming the people were ‘being disruptive, and supportive and wishing to undermine the political GOP party’ either were unaware of folks like you, or those who were banned for seemingly innocuous reasons (as far as I could tell goign back through their posting history- I found no claims of ‘never trump with some of them and no direct challenge to the owner- We’re not talking about people who are here to obviously overtly sabotage the republican party- but rather about folks like you- Again, thanks for posting- not many would have-


210 posted on 05/02/2016 2:52:47 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
you said.....#202 I honestly still don't know what it was, but that's fine. My view of the internet has always been that the people who own/run websites have the right to make their own rules. I was just pointing out that there is discipline of some kind being handed out, and I'm not sure the lines are clear for those who wish to continue making substantive posts.

yes they do! and I do not have to continue to pay $$$ to fund ------

Bat Lady

229 posted on 05/02/2016 3:50:50 PM PDT by The Bat Lady (God made the cat in order to give man the pleasure of petting the tiger. Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
.
258 posted on 05/02/2016 9:55:17 PM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson