Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj

Yes, of course you are correct, Al Aqsa is a separate structure. But, if you look closely at the French photographer’s work, the building he has recorded is the Dome of the Rock. In the B&W photos, it looks different, because it does not have the characteristic copper/gold top.

It would appear that both Al Aksa and the Dome are mosques. What would they be, if not mosques?

Like you, indeed I noticed the weeds growing on the pavement. It evidently was not trodden by heaps of people at that time.


51 posted on 05/02/2016 4:47:13 PM PDT by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: BlackVeil
It would appear that both Al Aksa and the Dome are mosques. What would they be, if not mosques?

Wikipedia is your friend, sometimes.

Note that the Dome does not have an accompanying missile silo, traditional of all mosques I know of.

ML/NJ

53 posted on 05/02/2016 5:51:42 PM PDT by ml/nj (av)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson