Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Adams exposes George Soros
dilbert.com ^

Posted on 05/01/2016 4:28:53 AM PDT by chopperman

See link.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; elections; fraud; soros; voterfraud; votingmachines
He is subtle.
1 posted on 05/01/2016 4:28:53 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chopperman

Akin to treason, vote fraud should be a capital crime.


2 posted on 05/01/2016 4:39:07 AM PDT by gasport (Live and Let Live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

Heh.


3 posted on 05/01/2016 4:41:19 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman
Google the Koch brothers with Republicans then Soros with Democrats and Soros and the results are similar over 500,000.

But Soros responses from MSM are neutral to fawning while Koch MSM responses are overwhelming negative, except the recent quotes from Charles Koch being negative about Trump.

4 posted on 05/01/2016 5:18:57 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

He who votes decides nothing. He who programs the vote counting machine decides everything.

Election software should be OPEN SOURCE and have multiple and unrelated recipients of the data. As well as multiple source for the software in the machines. Without the electoral college knowing what they are going to get in advance.

And the communication should be encrypted on something different than SSL to prevent the NSA from intercepting the packets and modifying them before arriving at the destination. They have the capability of doing this as they control the central nodes of communication in the USSA.

Still, is cheaper for them to hold the computer that count the votes. Thus the need to have multiple unrelated recipients AT THE SAME TIME. No dispatching computer at the middle. Cost more, but makes robbing the election more difficult.


5 posted on 05/01/2016 5:30:19 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Why is the US so gung-ho on voting machines? As noted in at least the last two elections, they can be readily tampered with. Why not just a simple paper ballot? There is no voter fraud in Canada, at least not of marking a vote for one person, but actually voting for another. Yes, it would take longer to count all the votes, but the results should be more accurate.


6 posted on 05/01/2016 5:51:18 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Canadian,

American party officials and our government rely on fraud to control the elections. It is easier to commit undetected fraud with the machine than the old fashioned ways of cheating elections.

Voting machines:
It is more cost effective and tidier than paying people to repeatedly vote. It involves far fewer cheaters and is not subject to photographic evidence.

They can flip the vote 51%-49% and it only requires the involvement of 2-3 people.


7 posted on 05/01/2016 5:59:49 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

I believe one of the major reasons the UniParty is so determined to defeat Trump is that he has exposed their criminal electioneering practices and, should he be elected, there will very likely be investigations into vote fraud and fundamental changes made to the whole election process, including a return to simple paper ballots, thus eliminating computer voting fraud.


8 posted on 05/01/2016 6:09:07 AM PDT by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

We use paper ballots in my county. They are easily counted by a scanner and you have backup.

The electronic machine is only for the disabled and the last election I worked it wasn’t even used. Even disabled people don’t trust it.


9 posted on 05/01/2016 6:17:31 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

The “Purple Finger” having voted, moves on.


10 posted on 05/01/2016 7:08:29 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

Yes.
Counted by a SCANNER.
Which uses software.

I don’t subscribe to the conspiracy, but if I did, that scanner would just be another issue.


11 posted on 05/01/2016 7:11:02 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

Paper and scanner here in Phoenix as well


12 posted on 05/01/2016 7:21:00 AM PDT by billphx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
Why not just a simple paper ballot?

Because of the volunteers in the back rooms of the union halls filling them out by the hundreds, to be "found" when that know how many they need?

13 posted on 05/01/2016 8:10:02 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

Part of me hopes that Hillary “wins” the election by voting machine fraud, but the fraud is so outrageous that millions of Trump supporters shut down government buildings across the country leading to a revolution.


14 posted on 05/01/2016 8:19:17 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
The problem with paper ballots (whether punch type or ink blot type) is that people are idiots. Idiots take the time to wait in line at the polls, but for some reason don't check their ballots to see that they have punched out all the holes or inked in all the circles.

At least that was the story from Florida in 2000.

Because of the incompetence of a few, electronic voting machines were foisted upon all of us without proper vetting.

We also now have vote by mail because people can't be asked to wait in a line for an hour or so to do their public duty, even though these same people will wait in line for hours to get a deal on a color TV. I'm sure that vote by mail is extremely open to fraud ... and incompetence as well.

At some point we're going to have to reorganize the US around tribal grounds, have everyone who votes dip his finger in purple ink, and you can only vote with your tribe since they know you.

15 posted on 05/01/2016 8:26:34 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Those improperly punched ballots were obviously the results of attempting to simultaneously punch multiple ballots quickly.


16 posted on 05/01/2016 8:59:17 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

No scrutineers in the US election process?


17 posted on 05/01/2016 10:46:49 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

Some news media had a story on showing how the scanner totals can be manipulated by the computer/software and when the backups are run they show the “fixed” totals.

What is “honest and trustworthy” anymore.


18 posted on 05/01/2016 12:43:35 PM PDT by conservativesister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Look for special voter fraud reporting apps for smartphones to come out in the next few months.


19 posted on 05/22/2016 10:35:59 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson