This reply is really for all who are reading this.
1st: We are losing companies to offshore locations because of federal regulations that make it impossible for them to thrive. The Obama Marxist policies implemented by the regulatory agencies are what’s choking our industries’ ability to prosper. Trump is wrong, and so is Rush. Trump should NOT be attaching fiscal penalties to our companies, but instead going after the regulatory agencies doing damage to our economy.
2nd: Boehner’s comments about Cruz are shared by 99% of the people in DC. “He would throw his own mother under the bus if it helped him...” is what I’ve been told by someone on the inside. I’ve seen it for myself. Cruz has been planning his run for President since before he ran for US Senate. Ever the opportunist, he saw the growing tea party movement and calculated how he could ride that wave into Washington. He is known as a liar and hypocrite on Capitol Hill by all who know him — detested by staffers and elected representatives alike.
WOW! he’s actually talking about regulation stifling biz now....as well as the way unions price themselves.
Replying to my own post here...
I want to add that Obama has deliberately and with forethought pushed the regulatory agencies to make it SO burdensome for our companies/corporations/manufacturing industries to stay here. Reason?
To push these companies OUTSIDE of our borders and become more global. It’s all part of his globalist plan. It accomplishes other objectives:
1. Weakens our economy
2. Raises the number of unemployed (now at nearly 94 million out of work), thus making more Americans dependent on the government.
3. Government dependency makes it easier to control/own the masses.
It’s all part of a plan, one that neither TRUMP or RUSH are acknowledging or being honest about.
(and for the record, I voted for Trump in the FL primary, so I have no axe to grind)
We have been experiencing offshoring long before Obama arrived. His policies just threw fuel on a fire that was already burning.
Our trade competitors in Asia keep their home markets restricted to provide a guaranteed market for their own firms. They do this because they consider jobs a national interest.
In contrast our home market is wide open. And our rivals can and do target industries that they want to dominate. Coordination between industry and gov’t that is illegal here is routine for our competitors. Our firms, operating all on their own, are routinely put out of business. This was understood by the Reagan administration, which was one of the last to push back.
1, for the most part, yes. Except . . . labor. The major cost of most products is labor. You cannot compete with slave labor. No amount of deregulation will address that.
That is the corporate party line but it is really propaganda to cover the real issue which is labor arbitration across international borders. Complaining about regulations and taxes are the political cover for off shoring. You have to watch BOTH hands of the magician to know what is going on.