Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Understood. I’m just not so sure as to how those California connections would fare with the average Trump-disposed voter, nor assured that the sort of establishment Republican voter there is going to jump on that aspect of a somewhat controversial potential VP to a campaign that is losing on all fronts, really.

The Cruz team may not be willing to face the music, but it certainly isn’t unaware that they’re not even following the sheet music. And, the Republican Establishment isn’t so avid now to invest much more in him. Frankly, it is too late for tricks and a magic show.

It’s over - he’s just unwilling to admit it.


363 posted on 04/27/2016 8:38:55 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

He is pushing for a war at the convention that will totally fragment the anti-Clinton opposition. He is fighting to blow up the coalition that could defeat Clinton.

His game is very dangerous. He gets his name in the history books, I suppose, but that’s about it.


373 posted on 04/27/2016 8:49:18 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

Here’s the bottom line in ALL OF THIS. If Cruz’ choice of whomever VP is so damned important and game-changing, where in the hell, and why in the hell was this person not put up for the nomination in the first place? If whoever it is was already a candidate, what would make anyone think that he/she is such a great damn choice now?

This hoopla over possible VP choice is just plain stupid.


375 posted on 04/27/2016 8:49:38 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson