If you don’t have a cut on you. Do you really want to play that game? Go ahead and I’ll bring the popcorn. I also said look at her gloves. They are not protective. Guess you couldn’t bother but wanted to start something.
“Any vet knows not to handle a dead bleeding rabid animal like that. Proof positive she knew it wasn’t rabid and is a liar.”
This is the comment I was responding to. She already pretty much admitted she lied about believing the cat had rabies. In this case, because it was a head shot and there was likely brain matter mixed in the blood she should have been wearing gloves if she thought the cat had rabies. Your comment was unclear, made it sound as though you thought that simply because the cat was bleeding that she could have exposed herself to rabies and that simply is not the case. Even if she had a cut on her hand. Rabies are not passed by blood to blood contact. They are passed through the saliva (or brain matter) of an infect animal. I was not trying to start anything at all, just trying to clarify. She put herself at risk because of the head shot, not because of the blood.