To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Quite frankly didn’t see that coming.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Gay rights trump the constitution.
3 posted on
04/25/2016 4:18:05 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
4 posted on
04/25/2016 4:20:11 PM PDT by
outofsalt
( I identify as a Cruz supporter)
5 posted on
04/25/2016 4:20:40 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
7 posted on
04/25/2016 4:21:27 PM PDT by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
8 posted on
04/25/2016 4:21:47 PM PDT by
SoFloFreeper
(Just say no to HRC)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
“By refusing to hear the case.”
What is the ratio of appealed vs. heard cases anyhow?
Would the next legal step be the USSC, or a Federal circuit? Normally for things like this it is a Federal circuit, which heretofore has been pretty fair on 1st Amendment issues.
I think the gays spike the ball too soon.
9 posted on
04/25/2016 4:22:11 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
10 posted on
04/25/2016 4:22:16 PM PDT by
PROCON
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Most have no clue to the levity of the SCOTUS decision “legalizing homosexual marriage”. It really was the final nail in the coffin for this evil nation...
12 posted on
04/25/2016 4:22:48 PM PDT by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The Colorado Supreme Court decided to let an appellate court ruling that a bakery violated the states anti-discrimination law when it turned away a gay couple stand by refusing to hear the case. Being against Discrimination is a moral judgement.
What gives them the right to impose their Morals?
15 posted on
04/25/2016 4:26:21 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
21 posted on
04/25/2016 4:33:45 PM PDT by
Vic S
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
“”The Colorado Supreme Court decided to let an appellate court ruling that a bakery violated the states anti-discrimination law when it turned away a gay couple stand by refusing to hear the case””
Is it part of journalism school to write such convoluted sentences? Reading most articles anymore gives me a headache - reading them over and over trying to make sense of them. AND after all that, I find it wasn’t even worth reading to begin with...
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Dulcolax® Laxative
“Sure. I’ll bake you a cake for your gay wedding!’
32 posted on
04/25/2016 5:41:04 PM PDT by
HWGruene
(REMEMBER THE ALAMO! Really, no kidding.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Anyone with a service dog who gets turned away by a Muslim cab driver needs to use this as precedent to sue that cab company to the ground.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Freedom of Association is so 18th Century.
41 posted on
04/25/2016 9:52:35 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(It is better to live one day as a lion than one hundred years as a sheep)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
42 posted on
04/25/2016 10:25:45 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson