There it is. The righteous indignation of a puff adder being disturbed in its nest. I mentioned no laws - why do you imply that’s my dependence? Why do you automatically condemn someone for who might consider a universal common meaning, unrelated to your Biblical Theology, of the phrase. I even provided a corollary for it, Tit-for-tat, but your sensibilities to the Bible only allow for the “correct” interpretation. Arrogance.
An eye for an eye IS “the law”. It’s part of “the law”.
And I didn’t condemn you... I asked you a simple question... would you rather live by the law or by grace and forgiveness?