[quoting Babwa]
Here is a better explanation of Cruzs business tax. It replaces current 35% Corporate tax And all payroll taxes - approx. 15:
What Is Ted Cruzs Business Flat Tax?
Ted Cruzs Business Flat Tax is what most tax policy experts would call a tax-inclusive subtraction-method value-added tax (VAT) or a business transfer tax (BTT). These terms are pretty technical, so Ill try to distill them down into something a little bit easier.
What this means, in plainer terms, is that its a broad tax on all kinds of income, levied on businesses and organizations. You, personally, wouldnt have to file it for yourself. Instead, it would be taken care of at the organizational level.
That does not, of course, mean its free. When businesses pay taxes on peoples behalf, it still ultimately means that the government gets some money that otherwise would have gone to people. Further on, well talk about who would end up losing money from the existence of this tax.
How Would It Apply To an Ordinary Businesss Income?
The starting point for a subtraction-method value-added tax is pretty simple, especially when it comes to everyday private businesses. You start with all of a businesss revenues. (Most likely, this tax would be filed on a quarterly basis.)
[Cruz avoids ‘double counting’ — very clear description here.]
However, you dont stop there: a problem with counting all business revenues is that it ends up being a double-counting. For example, suppose you love watching Disney movies on Netflix. Netflix gets revenues from your subscription, and then it uses some of that money to pay Disney for the rights to Disney content. If we counted that money both at the Disney level and the Netflix level, wed end up taxing the same basic product twice, merely because it involves two different companies. This is not good tax policy; thats why modern tax systems try to avoid this.
The way the subtraction-method VAT fixes this is by, well, subtraction. Under this kind of tax system, Netflix would count all of its revenue, but then subtract the amount that it pays to other businesses, like Disney. Disney would then have to account for its own revenue and also file taxes. The result is that everything gets neatly single-counted, and nothing gets double-counted.
Theres also one other thing the tax subtracts: capital costs. That is, when Ford builds a new auto plant, it can deduct those business costs as well. This is an important aspect of the tax, and it marks a slight difference with corporate income taxes today (which also allow these costs to be deducted, but over a much more complicated schedule.)
http://taxfoundation.org/blog/ted-cruz-s-business-flat-tax-primer
— Babwa
[quoting wolfie]
‘VATs act as an ersatz tariff on imports. Germany, for example, has a VAT that tacks on 19% to the cost of all imports. This raises the price on all imports and favors the purchase of domestic goods.’ ...
... please note, I dont necessarily support a VAT, just a tariff that would have the same effect. The beauty of the VAT is that is bypasses trade agreements that forbid tariffs:
Approximately 160 other countries are successfully using a VAT, and the playing field will never be level until we have one, too. Because these countries use a VAT and we dont, our exports are more expensive for them and their imports are cheaper than our domestically produced goods. This puts our factories out of business.
Germany, for example, uses a 19% VAT as a protective tariff against foreign manufacturers trying to sell to the German market. When American cars are exported from the U.S. to Germany, that 19% VAT is added to the price of the vehicle. Additionally, American companies pay an extra 19% in taxes in transportation costs, including docking, duties and insurance.
German products get rebated as they leave their home country and are not taxed upon entering the United States. This means the price of German-made products is lower, both in their home nation and here in America, than American-made goods. We must level the playing field if we want to be competitive.
— Wolfie