I wrote:
This article contradicts your assertion that "The earlier article about a day ago tells how Phyllis removed the President and she and the board installed people including her daughter." A couple days ago (Sunday), Phyllis was installing her daughter.
That is not what I was thinking! Here is what I was thinking ...
This article contradicts your assertion that "The earlier article about a day ago tells how Phyllis removed the President and she and the board installed people including her daughter." A couple days ago (Sunday), Phyllis was asking her daughter for a resignation.
I figured you'd get it, because I provided a link to my source for the contention, and presumably you would read the article and notice the disconnect between it, and my remark.
What I have read from your posts is certainly clarifying the infighting going on in Eagle Forum. As a Missourian most of my life prior to retirement, this is a sad chain of events.
Phyllis wrote a book which is one of the initiating items in my choice of life long conservatism in the early 60s as a youth. She has always stood for truth as she sees it.
Her recent disavowal of Rubio was an example of how sharp she still is today. Like her, her own family members have put a lifetime into the conservative cause. I think their internal disability to agree is similar to the division on this site — emotional because it is so fundemental.
Thanks for clearing that up. I’m glad someone was able to lay it out correctly and politely.
The original comment was a little off-putting, because of course the answer is “YES! People around here still DO read carefully and assess & correctly understand the facts.”
!!!!