Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
I know that conventional wisdom is that 1237 wins, but that rule isn’t carved in stone.

Well, the rule has been in place since 1856, so it kind of is carved in stone. If they didn't change the rule for Able Lincoln, for Ike, for Teddy Roosevelt, why would you think they would change it for Trump?

103 posted on 04/12/2016 7:06:12 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative
-- Well, the rule has been in place since 1856, so it kind of is carved in stone. If they didn't change the rule for Able Lincoln, for Ike, for Teddy Roosevelt, why would you think they would change it for Trump? --

Nothing is carved in stone. As for why the party would adjust, it would do so to preserve the existing power structure. If a popular candidate threatens the power structure, there is good reason to block that candidate's take-over. Lincoln, Eisenhower and Teddy Roosevelt were acceptable candidates. Trump is not an acceptable candidate.

I don't think they would block Trump that way, I think there are less obvious ways to protect the power structure and cause Trump to fail, and by fail, I mean either fail to get the office, or fail to implement his policies once in office.

108 posted on 04/12/2016 7:14:49 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson