Phyllis interviewed today & commented:
“(T)he attendees purported to pass several motions to wrest control of the organization from me,” Schlafly alleged in her statement. “They are attempting to seize access to our bank accounts, to terminate employees, and ... to control the bank accounts and all of Eagle Forum.”
Do you propose then that she’s wrong in saying this? That 4/6 dissenting Board Members who endorsed Cruz, have no personal agenda? Because they seem to think Schlafly is being influenced to wrongly support Trump.
One contentious board member, from January:
Cathie Adams of Texas, a Cruz supporter, told the Dallas Morning News last month that she has “no respect” for Trump, and she theorized that Schlafly’s endorsement of him was the result of “manipulation” from an unidentified source.
He was interviewed recently on the Alex Jones show. Phyllis is a great woman and would never have done an interview with such a nut job.
The problem with Ed was that he either did not understand or did not care that Eagle Forum is a collection of very committed conservative volunteers.
Not respecting that fact and his need to hand EF to Trump was part of his downfall.