Posted on 04/11/2016 1:16:33 PM PDT by SpaceBar
All Coloradans are free to lobby to get the process changed in their states. It’s not an issue for the rest of the country. And it would be dereliction of duty to a campaign’s supporters and donors if they didn’t work within the process to get as many delegates as they can. Cruz did the right thing and Trump ONLY complained about it after he failed out of pure sour grapes.
The Iowa story in the beginning was that the Cruz camp merely passed CNN’s reports along to the caucuses. Then the voicemails, from Team Cruz to the caucuses, were released. Team Cruz announced that Carson had suspended, and would have a big announcement the following week.
CNN announced neither of those things. They were lies—the first of many.
Michael Savage is a certifiable lunatic. ‘Nuff said.
If you believe that, I recommend you begin examining the writings of the Founders. Democracy was anathema to them.
I keep praying that something backfires on “Lyin’ Ted” soon!
...and this is why we can't have nice things.
So where was Trump worrying about this 9 months ago?
LOL
No they are not.
There are now Colorado Delegates that said they voted for Trump and were told their vote would not count.
What kind of monkey Bull$hit you are supporting?
That’s NOT a Free Republic.
Wow. Did Cruz really claim to be against John Robert’s and actually be on record supporting him?
That’s a new one on me. Is it true?
Hardly, but it does reveal the character of Ted and his toadies.
John Robert’s nomination - s/b
“Cruz did the right thing and Trump ONLY complained about it after he failed out of pure sour grapes.”
I’m absolutely mystified how the magnificent Deceptive Donnie can’t close the deal with these delegates.
Wasn’t he bragging how he was such a great dealmaker?
I think I’ll institute a class action lawsuit to have people sue Donnie for the “Art of the Deal”. They deserve their money back.
‘Romney, Graham, and the GOPe are all in with Cruz.’
You forgot McConnell.
No, that would be disenfranchising all the Republicans who actually showed up to their local precinct caucuses (the majority of whom chose Cruz).
This was ten or twelve years ago. I turned off Savage that night. I could no longer imagine listening to Savage's opinion on ANY issue. Today I can't imagine what anyone could tell me that would cause me to alter that practice.
I can't see what possible reason Cruz...or anyone else...could POSSIBLY have as a motive for using Savage to encourage or reinforce an opinion.
I can't imagine Cruz listening to Savage as long as it takes to laugh at him.
That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.
“How pathetic that all these people are making excuses for the ineptness of the trump campaign.””
Trump wins-he is a great strategist.
Trump gets out maneuvered- The other guy cheated.
Trump loses because he is ignorant of the rules- Trump’s ignorance is a virtue because he is not “an evil insider”.
“The will to win is not nearly so important as the will to prepare to win.” -Vince Lombardi
The smart one. He would know the finer points, use condoms not made of lambskin, have the kama sutra memorized, ensure we were compatible, learn from past performance issues, and know how to set the ambiance and mood.
The brain is the greatest sex organ.
My bad. His PAC is Cruz's bagman. How could I have overlook him?
Cruz supporters: In a perpetual trance and state of delusion.
Just today a Cruz supporter called me a liar for pointing out that McConnell’s PAC is all in for Cruz.
SMH
He will let us know as soon as he crawls out from under Ted's desk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.