You are citing the map that adds in 2012 results.
that is fine
but Cruz does even better on that map option as well.
Clinton has only 235 on the Cruz match up that adds 2012 results.
Clinton is only 10 away from victory in the map you are referencing
“You are citing the map that adds in 2012 results.”
I don’t think any of these mean much right now
States not polled are shown in gray are higher for the Trump map
They also make this statement:
“This far out, polling in most states is limited (or outdated) and may not hold much predictive value.”
“You are citing the map that adds in 2012 results.”
Yup ... I see that. My guess is that Cruz has been flying under the radar to most general election voters for most of the cycle so far. Trump has been getting all the attention and attacks.
I’m not trying to pretend I’m an expert on Florida, but I have lived here for 26 years and spent 9 of those years as a statewide computer services account manager. I know the state pretty well.
Cruz would only have strength in the Panhandle and parts of Jacksonville. The rest of the state is a second home to the US NorthEast. He is not well liked at all in Tampa Bay. He would need to really kill it here and I4/Orlando to overcome the beating he will take from Palm Beach to Miami.That’s where all the votes are.
Most republicans in the state are what you would call “squishy”. They would have no problem voting for Clinton over Cruz.
He really has no chance at all to win the state of Florida and if you use the 270 site you will see that without Florida he cannot win a general election.
That’s just reality.