Not even once.
I was operating under the assumption that you were dishonest. Now I'm beginning to think you are just nuts. Yes, i've shown to you several times where the FBI allowed Apple to use any means they wished to accomplish the task. I've quoted, and linked you to Comey's statement that Apple may keep complete control of any and all software used to access the phone.
But James Comey says the software would only work on the jihadi's device and would be retained by the technology giants - so no one else would have access to it.
And now you act like you don't remember. Like I said, you are coming across as "nuts."
Look, idiot, Comey's statement is
Exactly how many times does such an idiot as you need to be told that if it is
it has no legal existence!
Please show us where FBI Director James Comey is an IT expert who has the legal expertise who can make such a sweeping statement that "the software would only work on the jihadi's device" and know and swear that a technical fact that it would be true. You cannot, because FBI Director James Comey is NOT an IT expert and he cannot. As an IT expert, FBI Director James Comey probably didn't even stay at a Holiday Inn the previous night.
Finally, idiot, the challenge was to show, in the court order, your contention the section of the COURT ORDER where you claim it states unequivocally that Apple can keep the iPhone. You claim you have posted this section. I say it doesn't exist. Post it. Show us. You are claiming a legal impossibility! IDIOT. LIAR.