Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

And who is the “You” who will perform those miracles?

The reasons we are where we are is simply the consequences of those two groups living together under the same “roof”.

- If you have one group that has a significantly lower IQ, what kind of jobs do you think they will end up having (assuming there is absolutely no discrimination)?

- In a similar vein, how do you think the kids of the lower IQ group will do in school?

- I imagine you would answer that lower IQ group will be disproportionately represented in the menial jobs, and the lower IQ students will be over-represented in the group that flunks out. There will also be some that will have high level, good paying jobs, but much fewer, as well as students who get As, but again much fewer.

- Given human nature, what do you think the consequences of such reality is going to be in society. How will the various groups react?

- Well, it is a human trait to identify with groups, and what you look like is definitely one of the things we strongly identify with. Racial features are foremost in that identification. So the people who identify through their looks with the low IQ group are going to feel very resentful of the fact that so many of their “brothers” occupy the low rung of the ladder, and they will want to know why. And if you tell them that it’s because on the average that group has lower IQ, that will only get them more incensed, especially if they have been told that all races are on the average equal.

- There will also be plenty in the higher IQ group who, through guilt or ignorance or “fairness” will side with the grievances of the other group. Thus a coalition is formed against the remaining majority of the Higher IQ group to address those grievances.

- The choice that this majority has is to either comply, by giving in to their demands, or to resist those demands. Resisting the demands will result in protests, riots and violence. To possibly avoid that, the majority caves, and so it institutes anti-discrimination laws, preferential treatments, diversity, multiculturalism and on and on.

- This only exacerbates the problem, because the people getting preferential treatment will actually now perform even worse than before, because they know they can get away with it. On noticing this the majority gets even more incensed and prejudiced, escalating the problem even more, sooner or later ending up with more demands on the part of the lower IQ group and its allies.

- And again the majority is at the proverbial fork in the road of having to decide between saying enough is enough (which probably means war or some type of separation) or to appease one more time.

And that’s why I say that two easily identifiable groups with significantly different AVERAGE IQ, CANNOT (as in logical certitude) coexist peacefully together.

This is also true about islam and the west. The general statement for that is this.

Two groups of people with diametrically opposed WORLD VIEWS cannot coexist peacefully together. That goes for islam and the west, communism and the west, naziism and the west, fascism and the west, etc. The basic values that clash in these cases is that we believe in freedom, the other groups don’t.


56 posted on 04/08/2016 1:16:18 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: aquila48

When the bubble pops, and brutal reality reasserts itself, it will take brains (and some luck) just to survive. Those low-IQ pod-people raised in EBT welfare incubators will not survive when their electrical umbilical cords are cut.

I think that 2016 going into 2017 will be as epochal as 1861, or 1914, 1917, 1929, 1939, etc.

“Burning down the house in 2016”

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/02/26/burning-down-the-house-in-2016/

Strap in, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.


72 posted on 04/08/2016 4:22:45 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: aquila48

There is the rule of law, and you enforce it.

If rebellion breaks out, there is the rule of law to resolve the issue.

I don’t back government ‘abuse’, unless government intervention is clearly called for. If a lawless society wishes to push their agenda to the point they become so anti-societal that only a show of force will resolve the issue, then so be it.

Once they realize that open rebellion is not an option, they will decide to live peacefully as part of the system or be incarcerated or die.

It’s not a very pretty thing to contemplate, but what else is there?

Do we surrender civilized society to them, or do we force compliance so we all can live in peace?


95 posted on 04/08/2016 8:19:04 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson