Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave

BTW:

I was going to look you back up and apologize to an extent.

This may look like I am very against you. I am against a guy who has revealed his character as Ted has, to be anywhere near the processes of the convention.

Your 112 Committee idea may be a good one. I don’t know. I am just leery of Ted being in on that sort of thing.

I don’t trust him any farther than I can drop kick him.


254 posted on 04/07/2016 6:32:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

No apology necessary. It’s rough and tumble.

I think any objectively fair rules committee would have representation from all candidates who won delegates. Proportionally would make sense. And probably some slots just for party higher ups.

I would be surprised if that was not the process.


271 posted on 04/07/2016 6:43:12 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson