Posted on 04/07/2016 4:05:36 PM PDT by ez
Having Marco on the ticket might be better than Hillary or Sanders.
I know he's pro-amnesty and can't be trusted, but I think we are to a point where we can't be too picky. Trump is no conservative, as I understand conservatism, but if he can turn some things around (RINO or Dem Congress will fight him on about everything), or just stop the bleeding, I'm in for him.
A vote for William is a vote for Hillary #neverNorman
Rubio’s delegates are not his chattel. After the first vote, they are unbound and can vote for whichever candidate they choose.
I can’t see Trump with his ego giving the VP to Kasich when he stayed in the race after he was mathmatically eliminated just to try and deny the win to Trump.
He, Rubio, can release them, plead with them, offer them Trump Bucks, it doesn’t matter.
They are Americans.
They will wait till Kasich promises everyone a mailman job.
How about on the first vote. Can Rubio direct them to vote Trump?
Thanks EZ.
No way Marco wants to be associated with Trump
Secondly that's not the way the delegates work. The delegates do what they want not what the candidate wants. So if the option is Cruz or Trump, there are not a lot of Rubio supporters who are going to pick Trump. And Kasich’s delegates are no way going to Trump even if you pick Kasich as VP.
You need to understand if Trump does not have 1237 going in to the convention, Cruz wins.
Ah, indeed. I’m sure the possibility has crossed the Trump team’s minds?
Rubio is also liked in the Senate, so he satisfy one of Trump’s VP requirement. He want an insider who could get along with people in Congress to get bill passed
Going to study the convention rules to see if a candidate can direct their delegates to vote a certain way on the first vote...
I agree. Bill O’Reilly (and perhaps others) is already floating the theory that Cruz will offer Kasich the VP slot well before the convention, locking in his 143 delegates and narrowing the gap between him and Trump.
If Trump were to accept Liddle Marco (”who is actually a nice guy”) it would neutralize Cruz’s move and make it much easier to get 1237 regardless of California.
Probably not Trumps #1 choice, but “it’s business”. Rubio has served in the Senate and he was the speaker of the Florida House, so he has the legislative expertize Trump has said he would want. He’s also young, Hispanic, and has a different personality type that could offset Trump’s style. Trump would win Florida without him, whereas Kasich as VP would be a plus in swing-state Ohio.
Ironically this means the #3 and #4 candidates have a lot more power than they deserve!
“The Battle of Hastings?”
My reaction exactly. Do we really want to go back there?
Kind of reminds me of the little boy in the movie “Angels in the Outfield”..”It could happen!”?
In Illinois, for example, Trump picked the actual delegates when he won. In some states the delegate would be loyal to the candidate.
I’d just as soon not have an ineligible Cuban on the ticket, but if we have to have one, Cruz at least says he opposes amnesty.
Putting any amnesty pimps on the ticket would be shooting out your own tires.
Trump doesn’t need help in FL, if he’s going the losing candidate route, stategicaly he should choose Kasich, gotta win FL and OH. Thought that may cost him some votes else where.
The tens of millions of young disenfranchised Bernie voters are low hanging fruit for a young charismatic ethnic candidate
Bernie and hillary both look ooooold
Ithink rubio gives trump the best path to win and maybe trump can school him in coming to work and getting things done
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.