Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Anonymous Dropped Ted Cruz ‘DC Madam’ Phone Dox?
TheRightPerspective ^ | 04/01/2016 | NewGuy

Posted on 04/06/2016 2:48:10 PM PDT by vikingrinn

"Twitter accounts claiming to be allied with Anonymous have dropped alleged phone records of late DC madam Deborah Palfrey, showing Ted Cruz used her services."

(Excerpt) Read more at therightperspective.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affair; anonymous; cruz; ted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: vikingrinn
That is an old list that has been out there. I have a link to the original disclosures.

Why the Records are Being Publicly Released

These are from 2007. What is missing is the origination city and caller info. I have found the list of the originating cities, however there is no integrated identity on the list.

That is what the lawyer has threatened to release, along with the Verizon records.

People have found enough smoke in the list to raise suspicions about Congress and all the way to the Supreme Court. Roberts has maintained the gag order on this information.

Why would Roberts do this?
41 posted on 04/06/2016 3:21:32 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

You mention praying. Does it bother you that Ted Cruz gives less money to his church than Obama(Cruz gives ZERO)? Does it tell you anything about Cruz’s character?


42 posted on 04/06/2016 3:23:58 PM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
Saw it on the Internet? Omg it must be true. I will assuredly abandon all my principals and change my candidate preference. Where do I get one of those red hats?

I mean it was on the Internet.

43 posted on 04/06/2016 3:24:16 PM PDT by Iowa David (Cruz 2016 - Before it's too late)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vikingrinn

I’d rather not have posts hypothesizing about information that might follow. Either put up or shut up.


44 posted on 04/06/2016 3:24:33 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps

“Not much of a defense of Ted.”

Why would I need to defend Ted Cruz?

Feel free to keep praising Obama, though I not sure why you want to do that.


45 posted on 04/06/2016 3:33:47 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
to create trash to sully decent folks... willing to buy into lies and engineered garbage...who is playing them like a cheap fiddle...who are members of the Trump cult

OK, you are not fond of Trump. I have explained in a number of ways that I originally supported (also with $) Cruz, but have come to see him as part of the Establishment, and that Trump is the lone voice against the Establishment.

I am not a cultist; I am not bringing FR down by my discussions. I hope that some of us can have non-emotional, non-hyperbolic discussions of issues in this absolutely crucial election.

And I do my best to steer clear of rumors, to resist speculations, and to withhold snap judgements.
46 posted on 04/06/2016 3:34:46 PM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

so paralleling your candidate, you’re the “purist” as opposed to “trolls” who happen to disagree with your positions? hmmm... :smh:


47 posted on 04/06/2016 3:38:02 PM PDT by vikingrinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: vikingrinn

Are you seeing a psychologist yet?


48 posted on 04/06/2016 3:39:43 PM PDT by BreezyDog (Trump is the democrat backup plan if Clinton gets indicted...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
So what? Cruz was a Bushie in DC, working at the white house when her service was in its heyday. He was using hookers when he wasn’t a Senator and was less well known. Makes even more sense.

You make a fair point. He was apparently living in Washington D.C. from 1999-2003. Of course he didn't marry Heidi until 2001, so you'll have to strike one or two years off of that window.

But the implication here is that he was using the Madam's services while he was a Senator, and that's just straight up wrong, and an attempt to deliberately mislead people.

49 posted on 04/06/2016 3:45:21 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

What about the requirement of two sworn witnesses? and the thing about “he who is without sin, cast the first stone”?


50 posted on 04/06/2016 3:47:21 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

Don’t forget to drink your Ovaltine!


51 posted on 04/06/2016 3:48:28 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel
The list is obviously a poor fake, but Cruz was in DC when he worked for Bush as well as the times he did work in front of the SCOTUS . If you are refuting a post at least do it using information that is provable like the fake document but don’t use claims that can be verified as false.

I am chastised. Yes, I should have looked a bit deeper.

:)

52 posted on 04/06/2016 3:52:10 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Best case of projection I've seen in quite a while.


... create trash to sully decent folks
... willing to buy into lies and engineered garbage
... a candidate who is playing them like a cheap fiddle
...facts are not really all that important - especially when you have an agenda to push.
... all of Trump's well-known past with his 3 wives) a man with issues of objectifying women for sexual pleasure and a daughter who is clearly not attached to him for some reason
... members of a cult
... loves ludeness, loves pornography (prostitutes & married women & Ashley Madison)
... loves to buy politicians take money from GSachs, Soros, and all the rest of his big long list of owners.
... "a best-bud" of Hillary Clinton Glenn Beck & a crazed pastor who wants gay people to die (or whatever that was) (and shared the majority of her extreme leftist agenda his extremist Dominionist globalist/socialist theology all thew ay until he filed to run in the GOP primaries) to this very day.

Congrats. You're the winner.

53 posted on 04/06/2016 4:00:53 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vikingrinn

What has become of FR. I weep...


54 posted on 04/06/2016 4:02:08 PM PDT by Paradox (My positions can evolve, but Principles should be immutable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

“Trump is the democrat backup plan if Clinton gets indicted”

i’m sorry to hear projections based upon your contextual framework - considering your tagline, i sincerely hope it all works out for you!~ ;)


55 posted on 04/06/2016 4:03:07 PM PDT by vikingrinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Theo
 photo 10399268_10208048414826381_2750499932977853125_n_zpsllpr44yq.jpg
56 posted on 04/06/2016 4:07:21 PM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
People have found enough smoke in the list to raise suspicions about Congress and all the way to the Supreme Court. Roberts has maintained the gag order on this information. Why would Roberts do this?

Well, we already have a good idea of several options here, but here's mine:

Half (or more) of the politicians & lobbyists & policy wonks in D.C. are on that phone list, including Roberts. :-)

57 posted on 04/06/2016 4:14:04 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: vikingrinn

Since he was the Solicitor General of Texas in 2008, the year the phone records end, and not a Senator until 2012, if this is going to impact any 2016 candidate, it will likely not be him.


58 posted on 04/06/2016 4:18:33 PM PDT by Ingtar (68.9% del allocated. Trump 61.4%, Cruz 41.6% of required for nomination 4/6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

No, Cruz was the Solicitor General of Texas during that time.


59 posted on 04/06/2016 4:24:05 PM PDT by Ingtar (68.9% del allocated. Trump 61.4%, Cruz 41.6% of required for nomination 4/6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I’ve seen this list earlier today, but there are no names, just numbers— I did one reverse number lookup and it came up with a warning about begin an ‘unsafe’ number- whatever that means- Here’s the l ink

http://callername.com/3212873527

Also- those aren’t’ the numbers that were doing the calling- those are the numbers that were called according to the phone form

one phone number is from a super 8 hotel in Washington, not Texas as indicated on the phone record-

Contact: Harry Ufia
Title: Owner
Phone: 202-543-7400

http://www.buzzfile.com/business/Super-8-Motel-202-543-7400

While this is of course some years later- I would think the super 8 hotel would have had the same number for quite a number of years- So this number will likely be unable to be connected to Ted-

The 800 number seems to be from Columbus Ohio- not texas as indicated o nthe phone record

Reservations are made by calling Marriott Reservations 1-800-321-2211. Please
identify yourself as 17 Premier 2 staying at Courtyard Columbus Downtown.

Unless I’m reading the record wrong- These do not seem to be calls from cell phones for the most part- and are simply calls from hotels, one number which called twice is listed as ‘unsafe’ and is from a florida phone number- not a texan phone number-

do you know of anyone that has dun any investigation into the numbers? I’m certainly not a detective- and like i said, this is years later, numbers could have changed- but the numbers listed would need to tied to Ted in order for this report to have any substance at all- I’m not sure how one would go about looking up numbers that were used back i n2008 or whenever these were listed

I’m not saying this isn’t a legit AT&T invoice, but it seems some things are a bit strange- At the top of the numbers, one part says ‘cans To” and then “calls From”- ‘cans To”? The date at the top says 120/01 ?

I dont’ know how cell phone charges work- but it seems these are calls she would have made because it says “Airtime and Long Distance Charges” at the top there- Also it says ‘Number Called” Not “Number that called”- so wouldn’t this indicate she is the one doing the calling aND the numbers listed are the numbers of the people or hotels she was calling?

The date of the invoice also says 120/01 (which i guess could be 1/20/01, but there’s no backslash between the 1 and 20- but whatever-) then the calls listed below are all from 9/15? Don’t people get phone bills every month?


60 posted on 04/06/2016 4:24:13 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson