Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONFIRMED: Cruz Camp Stealing Trump Delegates from States Trump Won (VIDEO)
Gateway Pundit ^ | March 31, 2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/01/2016 5:03:48 AM PDT by Bratch

Townhall reporter Guy Benson today admitted the Cruz campaign is stealing Trump delegates in states that Trump won.

cruz car trump

The Ted Cruz campaign is running Cruz supporters as Trump delegates in states that Trump won. That way they can steal the nomination from Trump in Cleveland although they’ve only won a fraction of the states Trump has won.

Guy Benson: This has been percolating for several months. He has a very sharp legal team that know the rules inside and out in a way the Trump campaign clearly does not. It’s not just Louisiana. And it’s not just finagling to just get Rubio delegates or unbound delegates. What they’re also doing is getting people elected as Trump delegates who are not, in fact, Trump loyalists. So they would be bound to Donald Trump on the first ballot only. After which, although they are technically Trump delegates, they’ve been sort of put in place to jump.

And these are the same people who call Trump supporters ‘morons’ one day and beg them to support Ted Cruz the next.

CONFIRMED: Cruz Camp Stealing Trump Delegates at State Level

 

 


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; dishonorablecruz; primaries; trump; whinydonald
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 561-568 next last
To: Ray76
Not yet. But a candidate is busily undermining the will of the voter, so to prevent there being a majority candidate.

Huh, what? How is anything anyone is doing going to stop a candidate with the majority of delegates from winning on the first ballot?

221 posted on 04/01/2016 7:48:23 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump isn’t about rules...he thinks he should be awarded the nomination!!!


222 posted on 04/01/2016 7:49:30 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You people can defend Ted all you want but it’s wrong. If Trump did this i’d be very disappointed in him, not even sure I’d still vote for him. Just because the RNC made stealing legal doesn’t make it right.

But then Cruz supporters know who he is and that doesn’t stop them.


223 posted on 04/01/2016 7:50:01 AM PDT by Kenny (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

These arguments are like well, the establishment will change the rules next election. They’ll have it that you have to have 2,000 delegates to win on the first ballot. The establishment makes sure they keep in at least 3 in the race. That making sure no one can get the 2,000 so it will always be chosen by the establishment from then on? That’s to say this isn’t going to happen from now on? Once they get their man in this time the rules will forever be written their way?


224 posted on 04/01/2016 7:50:08 AM PDT by STARLIT ((Tea Partier))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I hope that amounts to something. At this point, however, it is pretty obvious that Trump doesn’t have the organization necessary to protect delegates and motivate the grass roots. That becomes even more important after the primary. Trump is trying to run his campaign on the cheap. That needs to change. If this isn’t the wake up call he needs to shake things up and start investing in infrastructure then, Houston, we have a problem.


225 posted on 04/01/2016 7:50:45 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Maybe he’ll be able to cheat the Russians out of Ukraine and cheat the North Koreans and Iranians out of their nukes. Think of the possibilities for an unlikeable and unpopular man to assert control over situations by using a book of rules

Bears repeating.

226 posted on 04/01/2016 7:52:03 AM PDT by Kenny (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

“There’s no usurping of the people’s will here. The delegates elected to vote for Trump at the convention will do so as required by the rules. On the first ballot. End of discussion. All of this (what’s discussed in the article) only will come into play if no one has the magic number come convention time.”

Not only that, isn’t the Trump campaign vetting their delegates before they are chosen to be sure they are loyal? If not, that’s a big blunder and shows a lack of experience and knowledge.


227 posted on 04/01/2016 7:53:54 AM PDT by RedWhiteBlue (Mama tired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NIKK

Each convention writes its own rules.

Regardless, if you try to follow my argument, you see that enacting a “Trump rule” whereby the “guy with the most votes” (plurality) automatically wins is a recipe for more shenanigans and division in the future.

You will see multiple candidates staying in the race and the plurality of the winner getting smaller and smaller.

Meanwhile, minority fringe candidates with no support from the party will win the nomination, then fail miserably in the general

Do you really want to automatically nominate the guy with 22% support who is all for stopping global warming and increasing immigration?

Maybe stop focusing on this one guy (Trump) winning and try thinking in abstract, objective terms. What is a party for? Why would it select a nominee who holds positions opposite to a majority of its members?


228 posted on 04/01/2016 7:55:11 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Following the rules and planning ahead is “stealing?” Yet, not being willing to change the rules (being close to 1237 is good enough!) is somehow the only legitimate process?

This is getting very confusing!


229 posted on 04/01/2016 7:55:51 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
Rubio? LOL

If the GOP even tries to do what you're implying, it will mean the end of the party. I don't believe kamikaze is their style which is why I believe he met with the party elites yesterday.

The message should be clear. If Trump is going to be the guy, he needs to start acting more presidential and work to unite the party rather than engaging in 7th grade schoolyard nonsense.

He also needs to get better people working for him because he's being outplayed on the ground. That's because he's not spending money. You cannot save your way to prosperity in a national election.

You can be reactive or proactive. I prefer he be the latter, especially if he's going to take on the Clinton/DNC machine. He has no idea what is coming at him. At some point, he needs a wake up call. Let's hope this is it.

230 posted on 04/01/2016 7:56:17 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

“under the old rule (pre kookpaul) it was a PLURALITY of the delegates and five states.”

Completely and utterly false. It has been a MAJORITY of delegates for 160+ years.


231 posted on 04/01/2016 7:58:30 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Trump running as a Third Party candidate will make it easier for democrats who hate everything republican to vote Trump and feel okay about doing so. Trump is perhaps the most viable third party candidate we’ve ever seen.


232 posted on 04/01/2016 8:00:30 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
There is no GOP without Trump voters

You know Cruz supporters can play that game!!!

233 posted on 04/01/2016 8:00:51 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Ok, I understand what you’re saying and it does make sense. So a none political person has little or on chance of being President because he is coming into this ground game strategy way late in the game?


234 posted on 04/01/2016 8:01:51 AM PDT by STARLIT ((Tea Partier))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

“And if Trump was doing this the Cruz people would go ballistic about how underhanded and evil Trump is”

Not true for me at all. In fact, I EXPECT Trump to be making deals for delegates for every ballot after the First. There will be plenty of wheeling and dealing by both Trump and Cruz. That is what is SUPPOSED to happen.


235 posted on 04/01/2016 8:02:12 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dforest

And you would be singing a different tune!!!


236 posted on 04/01/2016 8:03:09 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David

First thing, Trump never quits
He just doesn’t
It’s his mantra to others, probably his own kids

Second if Rafael ends up with 1237 delegates and 4 million less popular votes than Trump, then any victory he claims will be pyrrhic

Don’t care what the “ rules” say when people just keep rewriting them

Funny but that’s how the totalitarians of the right and the left legitimize themselves .... By writing rules to keep themselves in power ...the North Koreans are real sticklers for the rules, Saddam, Hugo Chavez,.... Real sticklers for the rules . And the rules made sure they won, every time


237 posted on 04/01/2016 8:05:31 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mase
You can laugh, but the GOP will do anything to get what they want.

As for the end of the party,. then they should have thought about that when they got cruz and Kasich to do their dirty work.

the party is dead to me and many others.

238 posted on 04/01/2016 8:07:10 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: NIKK

Well, it is designed to be a system whereby a person who is active in the party (and friendly with a lot of people who are in it) gathers support and wins the nomination.

Now a completely out of it maverick could always win like Trump is trying to, by simply winning the delegates he needs on the first ballot.

If he has to rely on actual relationships with actual people who are delegates, he will probably be way underplayed.


239 posted on 04/01/2016 8:07:50 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

No! One candidate knows the rules and is playing to win....the other is trying to ignore the rules a be awarded the nomination.


240 posted on 04/01/2016 8:08:31 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 561-568 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson