Posted on 03/31/2016 11:51:15 AM PDT by Lockbox
As the FBI enters the final phases of its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized email server for government business, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey are meeting frequently to discuss the progress and handling of the highly sensitive case, a source told Fox News.
Among the issues discussed in the meetings, which have been taking place several times per week, are who will be interviewed and in what order, according to an intelligence source close to the ongoing case. Emails released by the State Department have already shown Clinton and several key aides used the personal, unsecured network to send more than 1,000 messages which have been deemed classified.
The formal interview requests are now being rapidly organized to set a time, date and place for the individuals to speak with federal agents about how their names have surfaced in the FBI’s ongoing criminal investigation. The interviews would not require any statements under oath, and subjects could decline them.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Chrissy Christie? Please!
Hey sometimes the guy you hate for Prez you love for AG.
That's what I think as well. Getting their stories straight. If she committed a crime, she would have been arrested by now, or some one else would have already taken the fall. They will question her and find she did no wrong.
They’ll have to have evidence because, as much as I hate her, I know she won’t confess.
Ever watch “48 Hours”? Normally, they know who committed the murder because of previous arguments, etc., but most of the time they have no legal case without a confession. Most perps confess, but Mrs. Bill Clinton won’t.
Tokenism.
The.....Fix.....is.......IN!
Never... gonna... happen.
Christie’s kumbaya moment with Ø around the Sandy campfire was vomit-inducing enough for me to swear him off for several lifetimes.
Yes... for FBI staff comedy night.
Hey I’m with you I can’t stand the guy but he’s perfect for AG. Regulators are supposed to be nasty tempered and unlikeable. As they always told me when they came for an audit. “We are here to find wrongdoing”.
Yeah...I often wonder what Martha Stewart thinks...since she was a big Clinton supporter
“If she committed a crime, she would have been arrested by now, or some one else would have already taken the fall”
A third possibility is that someone in the know and complicit in the illegal acts will, under a grant of immunity, turn state’s evidence against Clinton. I presume the FBI is marching up the food chain right now.
I still believe there are good guyz left.
“since she was a big Clinton supporter”
Irrelevant to the question at hand.
2. A common man would think that 'not under oath' = no lying if your recollection is off.
We were just talking.......
Long read but worth it.
http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/how-to-avoid-going-to-jail-under-18-u-s-c-section-1001-for-lying.html
So the correct response to any Federal Employee’s question is Lawyer!
If the pantsuit is too tight, you must indict!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.