Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoKoolAidforMe

“I am well aware of the topic of this thread.”

Oh. OK. Never mind. I thought you were ignoring the case in front of us and the little dears who killed the old folks.


64 posted on 03/31/2016 1:14:21 PM PDT by jessduntno (The mind of a liberal...deceit, desire for control, greed, contradiction and fueled by hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

Read the FBI’s order against Apple and Apple’s letter to its customers. Then read the Fourth Amendment. This case is not about Apple refusing to honor a search warrant.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2714001-SB-Shooter-Order-Compelling-Apple-Asst-iPhone.html

http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This case is not about the federal government trying to prevent further terrorist attacks. It is about a tyrannical and over-reaching government that wants to take control of the people by violating their Constitutional rights. If the government truly wanted to prevent terrorism, our borders would be sealed and the “little dears” would never have been allowed to enter the United States and obtain employment with a local municipality.

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.


137 posted on 04/01/2016 9:26:03 AM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (I'm clinging to my God and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson