Replies

Not going to play your silly game. What you posted was a suggested method. The filing said that Apple can use any means they want to accomplish the task. It said Apple can keep complete custody of the phone.

No. No. and no. Lies, all of what you said.

The head of the FBI even clarified that Apple does not have to give the government any sort of software at all. I've already posted the link to you before, so you can look back in your history if you want to see it.

If it's not in the Court Order, it doesn't exist. It doesn't have any force. . . nor did you provide any worthwhile links. Lies.

READ THE COURT ORDER. That is all that matters, not what is said as an argument in any filing. Nothing else matters. Haven't you EVER been subject to a court order???? Obviously not.

I've told you before, I have SAT ON A JUDICIAL BENCH and ISSUED SUCH ORDERS. You can't be as stupid as you come across. . . but maybe you are.

Rarestia?

Do you see what I mean? I posted the exact words from the court order and this is what we get. . . complete denial that those words mean what they say. . . and fantasyland whole-cloth creation that APPLE CAN KEEP COMPLETE CUSTODY OF THE EVIDENCE! And also complete refusal to post the actual words! Delusional.