Posted on 03/31/2016 5:50:44 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Ping
Hannity also said Cruz was responsible for that ad with Melania Trump in it. Then said he was wrong after the damage was done. So why would i care what he has to say?
They don’t have Megan Kelly eye <sarc
But, but, Limbaugh convicted Corey Lewandowski weeks ago.
Uhm considering Jeff Roe purchase the rights to the photograph used, the advertisement could only have been made with his knowledge and consent.
Actually, something DID happen.
A Honduran operative, a serial political pseudo-victim,
who was WARNED by the US Secret Service to stay
away from the US candidate, reapproached and assaulted
him for Honduras and its criminal illegal aliens,
led by HER MOTHER.
She, and possibly her mother, have violated
18 U.S. Code § 3056, but since the Law only holds
against Americans who are non-Moslem, NOTHING will happen.
Do you have any idea how much you sound like a middle school girl?
...and in the background, Ben Terris is laughing his a$$ off! Terris is the one who got this whole shebang rolling. Terris is the one who egged on Fields with his feigned concern over her well being and interest in telling HER story. Without his elaborate exaggeration there would have been no story. He manipulated this whole mess at the start and quickly faded into the background while so many in the media and here at FR just kept pushing that snowball downhill.
Terris has scammed everyone......but nobody sees or cares.
So you’re accusing Cruz of breaking federal law?
There is no proof Roe purchased the rights to the photo. That shouldn’t be too hard to prove.
MF’s boyfriend has been writing Hannity? (Jamie Weinstein, senior editor of The Daily Caller http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/03/trump-campaign-manager-breitbart-reporter-220472)
BTW, Napolitano has had MF on his show many times, as early as February 18, 2011 while she was still in college. How did she get that gig?
GQ stated Roe purchased the rights. Someone posted the link to the article on one of the threads.
“Breaking! Press Release: Complaint and request for Criminal investigation sent to the AG of FL against Dave Aronberg, Prosecutor of Palm Beach county for abuse of power in filing politically motivated bogus criminal complaint against Trumps campaign manager”
GQ stated Roe purchased the rights. Someone posted the link to the article on one of the threads.
That was fake. If you google GQ, Roe, Melania nothing shows up. It was a fake twitter post.
Good point.
Do you have a link for that? I would like to read more about it.
“Uhm considering Jeff Roe purchase the rights to the photograph used, the advertisement could only have been made with his knowledge and consent.”
According to information in a published article, no such purchase took place, and no such purchase could have happened. GQ did not own the rights to the photograph, so GQ was not capable of licensing the photograph to Roe, the SuprePac, or to anyone else. The owner is reported to be the photographer, Antoine Verglas; and he is complaining the photograph has been used by the SuperPac without his permission and in violation of his copyright on that photograph.
Did I say Cruz, no I didn’t. I said Jeff Roe, who happens to be his campaign manager. Did Cruz himself know of the ad before it was aired and the issue was brought up, debatable, but unlikely. Did Cruz’s Campaign know, debatable, but likely as Jeff Roe had to give consent to use the image in the ad.
I keep waiting for someone to point out the exact instance, the exact frame, where the assault occurred.
I read that Mark Levin can spot it. Why doesn’t he show it to the world.
A guy here locally referred to the “grab” that was made, but no one can spot a grab.
Even if it were a grab, it could certainly be considered warranted.
Many people have been assassinated in the exact same manner she approached Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.