Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

To an extent, yes I do believe in “Economic Nationalism.” Now that can be done the right way, or the wrong way. But I believe the pursuit of absolute “Free Trade” is a fools’ errand.

How can anything that requires an agreement that is over 20,000 pages be considered “Free Trade”?


76 posted on 03/30/2016 12:26:35 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator
"How can anything that requires an agreement that is over 20,000 pages be considered “Free Trade”?"

Real "Free Trade" would not be an agreement. We don't need a counter-party with whom to "Deal".

Real Free Trade would be the elimination of taxation and bureaucracy on all imports to and exports from the U.S. We could declare that unilaterally with a law from Congress REPEALING tens of thousands of pages of rules and taxes.

104 posted on 03/30/2016 1:08:32 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (No vote has been changed due to an FR post in about 2 months. Chillax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson