Surprise: Trump Attacks Walker For...Not Raising Taxes in Wisconsin

Townhall.com ^ | March 29, 2016 | Guy Benson

[Kaslin]

It's been a rough 24 hours for Team Trump. The billionaire's campaign manager has been arrested for battery against a female reporter -- with new surveillance conclusively proving that he lied about the incident and smeared his accuser -- and the candidate himself was subjected to a string of inhospitable interviews with conservative radio hosts in Wisconsin. We wrote about his exchange with Charlie Sykes yesterday; later, he hung up on Vicki McKenna after he grew exasperated with her questions about his threats and insults against Heidi Cruz.  The Texas Senator narrowly leads in recent Badger State polling and just landed the endorsement of Scott Walker, who is extremely popular among Wisconsin Republicans.  Trump, as is his wont, responded to Walker's decision by blasting the governor's record.  First, he regurgitated the debunked Democratic attack that Walker racked up a multibillion-dollar deficit, a blatant falsehood that Trump blamed on Time magazine during yesterday's Sykes interview.  Using inaccurate left-wing talking points to slam Walker wasn't his fault, the candidate told the host's large statewide audience, because all he did was was repeat what Time had written back then.  Over to you, Washington Post fact-checker:

The only time that the $2.2 billion figure has appeared even on Time’s website is after the magazine published a transcript of the second Republican debate, on Sept 16 — and quoted Trump as jabbing at Walker: “In Wisconsin, you’re losing $2.2 billion right now.” He added: “You were supposed to make a billion dollars in the state and you lost $2.2 billion. You have right now a huge budget deficit. That’s not a Democratic talking point, that’s a fact.” But here’s the rub: weeks before Trump uttered the claim at the September debate, fact checkers had already called him out for using it. On July 28, PolitiFact Wisconsin gave Trump a “mostly false” for making this claim in a campaign event. And on July 29, FactCheck.org published an article titled “Wisconsin’s Trumped Up Deficit.” Both fact checks made similar points: Wisconsin, under state law, is required to have a balanced budget. There had once been a projected budget shortfall of $2.2 billion over two years, back in November 2014, after an earlier projection of a $1 billion surplus. But the shortfall was never a deficit — because the law requires a balanced budget. Indeed, on July 12, two weeks before Trump made the comments that were fact checked, Walker signed into law a two-year balanced budget.

The only time that number appeared in print at Time was when they quoted...Donald Trump. And the broader point he was using to pummel Walker had been disproven multiple times. So by repeating the Democrat-approved smear, Trump was either knowingly lying, or he was too lazy and ill-informed to understand the truth. Both options seemed plausible at the time, but not anymore.  Less than 24 hours ago, he was called out for the misstatements, for which he blamed the media. The very next day, he repeated the misstatement. There's your answer to the 'lie vs ignorance' question. And here's the kicker:

.@realDonaldTrump bashes @ScottWalker for not raising taxes in the Badger State https://t.co/oLxgS0VFyb pic.twitter.com/alN9StloAH— Justin Green (@JGreenDC) March 29, 2016

Let's be crystal clear: Donald Trump is not a conservative. He would not govern as a conservative. He distorts (wildly successful!) adherence to bedrock conservative principles as a means to launch self-serving broadsides against actual conservatives.  Let's pretend for a moment that the $2.2 billion number wasn't total garbage.  Trump's policy critique would be that Scott Walker did not seize upon that 'opportunity' to justify tax hikes on Wisconsin's workers.  This coming from a man who routinely -- and rightly -- bemoans the looming national debt crisis, while rejecting responsible and necessary conservative reforms to the largest drivers of that crisis and vowing not to raise taxes.   It's incoherent.  It's untenable.  It's unserious.  It's Trump.  I began by asserting that Trump has encountered some campaign turbulence this week.  I'll leave you with more evidence to that effect, courtesy of two staunch Trump defenders:

Ann Coulter: Defending 'mental' Trump like constantly bailing 16-year-old out of prison.https://t.co/mIWBjUdxMU pic.twitter.com/pEemmcGDCL— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) March 29, 2016

Newt Gingrich on Hannity tonight: Trump's retweet disparaging Heidi Cruz "utterly stupid." It sent a signal of "instability" to voters.— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) March 29, 2016

And oh, by the way:

Poll: 73% of women have unfavorable view of #Trump https://t.co/mKt9ZmLyGc - panel weighs in #TheLead— The Lead CNN (@TheLeadCNN) March 25, 2016

Trump earned his 70% unfavorable rating among women *before* his campaign manager was arrested for battery against a woman. That's skill.— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) March 29, 2016

[PA Engineer]

Well it’s also silly to call her contact assault outside of making a rhetorical point about how silly she is being. Nor even battery (which I just learned is the correct term for physical contact that is violent or sexually aggressive...while assault means threatening battery)

What would have happened to you or I if we forced away into a Secret Service cordon?

[Mase]

I understand that. Then his unfavorable rating outside registered republicans must be about 99%. Either that or the polls are wrong.

There is no way to win when your unfavorables are that high with women. Unless Hillary ends up in jail, this means an epic loss in November.

[AndyTheBear]

Not sure. Not really anxious to test that theory. My vocabulary is improving today though...just looked up cordon.

I will grant she had no right to try to push past the cordon. But I am not sure how many reporters do typically. So I am not really ready to fault her for it. Its the making the story about herself over a load of crap charge I fault her for.

[napscoordinator]

Cruz is the golden child. He is Teflon. The media and GOPe love Cruz. He’s very lucky he is not being vetted.

[Norseman]

What you wrote is true. And that’s exactly why the mainstream press has given Trump a couple of billion, yes, billion, dollars of free publicity without bothering to vet him.

When he gets better vetting from conservative radio hosts in Wisconsin than he’s gotten from the mainstream press in the entire election process thus far, it’s pretty obvious the fix is in for Hillary and that the Left views Trump as eminently beatable. Which he most certainly is, as polls regularly show, but Trump supporters only believe the polls that show Trump on top and ignore the rest.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Your commentary is the very definition of insanity.

[LMAO]

Cruz is the golden child. He is Teflon. The media and GOPe love Cruz. He’s very lucky he is not being vetted.

---

Yup

Just as I predicted in post #14

[sergeantdave]

So that we know where Guy Benson has planted his flag -

“As we stated this morning, it is now obvious that Ted Cruz has emerged as the only conservative alternative to Donald Trump,”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/03/09/cruz-delegate-conundrum-n2130737

Carry on, people...

[editor-surveyor]

.
Its only a statement of fact, relative to the rules of the primary.

There clearly are no other conservative candidates.