“The anti-Trump, pro-Cruz PAC fired the opening round and I believe it was done in Cruz’s name whether he approved it or not.”
It IS an anti-Trump pac. That does not mean it is a pro-Cruz pac, or that he has ANYTHING to do with it.
Wasn’t Cruz’s name mentioned in the ad?
Except... They very same ad said -— VOTE FOR TED CRUZ!
But nothing to do with Cruz. Yeah, right.
So the ad said, "Vote Kasich" or the ad said, "Vote Cruz"?
You're being absurd.
Delusional ! delusional ! Delusional!
“It IS an anti-Trump pac. That does not mean it is a pro-Cruz pac, or that he has ANYTHING to do with it.”
You mean the little blurb about ‘vote for Cruz’ on the ad doesn’t mean it’s a pro-Cruz PAC that put it out?
Get real.
“That does not mean it is a pro-Cruz pac”
The ad read “or you can vote for Ted Cruz”...
It didn’t say “or you can vote for someone else” OR
“you can vote for John Kaisch”
Ted Cruz’s name was used. If he didn’t like that, he should have been HOWLING about it from the very beginning!
The only thing he had to say, FINALLY was it was “inappropriate”
You can’t say that ad was not promoting Cruz when it says on the ad “or you can vote for Ted Cruz”
If the race is down to either Trump or Cruz and the PAC is anti-Trump then obviously the PAC is pro Cruz. This is not rocket science. Amazing the Cruzers can fathom simple logic. Add to that the fact that the ad had “support Ted Cruz” in and still the Cruzers will not own up to it. Liz Mair even said the purpose of the ad was to rally voters to Cruz. It a damn pro Cruz PAC that launched the attack on Mrs Trump. And Cruz waited until after the Utah primary to call the ad inappropriate. Typical of “principled conservative” to wait until after the damage is done to comment.