So the Committee could come out with a new rule that states candidates who win a majority of delegates in more than 5 states are INELIGIBLE (in the cause of White Privilege no doubt) and we should be fine with that?
Any rule that just happens to exclude Trump is a good rule, eh ?
Maybe they’ll make a rule that only candidates who have previously held some national elected office are eligible for the party nomination ? That would exclude Trump and put Cruz, Kasich, Rubio, and Jeb back in play.
The RNC keeps reminding everyone that the PARTY has the right to nominate whoever they like, which makes the Primary process inclusion of voters a farce. If that was going to be the case, the voters deserved to know from the beginning. Trump would have run 3rd Party and the GOP would have Jeb and Cruz and Kasich fighting it out and still losing in national polls to Trump running as an independent.
Way back at the beginning, Trump extracted a promise from the RNC to “treat him fairly” in exchange for his promise no to run 3rd Party. If the RNC throws away its honor, the GP is FINISHED.
If that happens, Trump should demand immediate action from all the State election boards to allow late filing for Independents and get his name on all ballots. GOP voters will vote for him just out of spite for what the RNC has done. The GOPe candidate will have the distinction of the lowest vote count in history.
I didn't even allude to such an absurd position, did I?
So, why did you choose to twist my words thusly?