[okie01]

Any rule that just happens to exclude Trump is a good rule, eh ?

I didn't even allude to such an absurd position, did I?

So, why did you choose to twist my words thusly?

[Kellis91789]

I didn’t refer to “you” anywhere in my post, nor imply you were anti-Trump. You commented that the rules process has always been this way and I put out several examples of the absurdity of that logic while the RNC has always maintained a pretense that the primary voters matter.

Either the voters DO matter, or the rules can be arbitrary and the voters DO NOT matter, but the RNC can’t have it both ways.