Posted on 03/25/2016 3:16:41 PM PDT by george76
Anyone who didnt see this one coming just wasnt looking. In our countrys recent history weve celebrated diversity in our population as if it were a good thing. However, one look at world history will show you that no country with a diverse population of different races, languages, and religion has long survived.
Countries dont naturally form with a diverse population, and when in the past theyve occurred its usually been as a result of armed conquest. These unnaturally formed countries have either melded together into a single population made up of one mixed race with one language and one religion or theyve come apart, and theyve usually come apart with extreme violence. The longer these diverse populations were forced to coexist with one another without mixing and becoming one, the more the hatred grew among them and the more violently they broke apart, but break apart they did, or genocide has settled the issue once and for all.
The Enemedia is successful at burying the inconvenient truth.
To learn, who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
Did the two victims survive? Yes. If you persist and follow the story to the end, you will read that they are both experiencing horrible psychiatric difficulties. The young man who was engaged to be married - his life was tuned upside down and he lost his fiancé. He has a small daughter, I believe.
Basically they are experiencing all the same symptoms that women feel who are violated and raped - nightmares, fear, etc. It is a tragic case. I would not feel too badly is these animal were confronted by other prisoners.
All of the immigrants, both legal and illegal, have ruined Antioch. They are the reason that Hickory Hollow mall died.
“Like Trump says repeatedly, the media are the most dishonest group of people in America”
Besides Trump who is usually in bed with them and until they dare question him then they are trash. I don’t understand how so many smart people can fall for Trump and his phony conservatism.
“Terrible reportage!”
This reporter does a little better:
ø
“The media is the enemy. The Liberal Democrats who control the news are our enemy. These are the ones we should be trying to wipe out financially, with lawsuits, and by direct confrontation.
We should use all legal means at our disposal to pry the transmitters out of the hands of Liberals.”
So WHY are wealthy, or groups of not-so-wealthy, conservatives, not working together to create at least one alternate news source. Obviously, FOX is not it. Everyone complains that the left controls the media and that is the problem, but no one else takes on the challenge to create an opposition medium. Am I totally crazy in thinking this is totally crazy? Are conservatives just not willing to risk their resources? Just too bored or otherwise busy? How can political opposition survive when it cedes the battlefield to the enemy?
Thanks for the information.
Leni
Thanks so much for your much-appreciated effort to answer my query.
Happy Easter!
Leni
This has puzzled me for decades. I think I finally discovered the answer when McConnell and his group did everything they could to take out McDaniel in Mississippi, and then proceeded to roll over for Obama on everything he wanted.
They are really not two different parties. They are simply different faces of the "Power Corridor" party.
Obviously, FOX is not it. Everyone complains that the left controls the media and that is the problem, but no one else takes on the challenge to create an opposition medium.
There are people who are trying. Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit has been working to create "Pajamas Media." Glenn Beck was trying to make something out of "the Blaze". One American News Network seems to be an effort to create a conservative network.
The truth is it takes Billions of dollars to get started in creating something that can compete with the big networks, and of course the existing networks do everything they can to deny them credibility and respect.
Am I totally crazy in thinking this is totally crazy?
No. I've been wondering the same thing for years.
Are conservatives just not willing to risk their resources?
I think in a match up, Liberals tend to have far more money than do we. Many of them just inherit it, and many of us had to pick ourselves up by our bootstraps. I have long believed that it is money and prosperity that is the root cause of Liberalism, and so it is no surprise to me to see great wealth influencing people to be Liberal.
Conservatives, on the other hand, often have to deal with necessity, and this is why we have a more realistic view of the world. Some of us get rich, but I really believe the bulk of the money is in the hands of the other guys.
Just too bored or otherwise busy?
I think that most of us simply don't grasp the nature of the problem. We think about this problem in an abstract sort of way. We think of it like the weather. It's just the way it is, and we can't really do anything about it.
This is, of course, wrong, but I don't think most people realize that we could actually do something about it, and that we really need to try to do something about it.
How can political opposition survive when it cedes the battlefield to the enemy?
We aren't. We are getting slaughtered. Clinton was elected because of the biased Media. Obama was elected because of biased media. Bork was "Borked" because of biased media. "Queer this" and "queer that" became accepted because of a biased media.
We are literally getting destroyed because our message and our ideas are never permitted to reach the American Public. Meanwhile every hair-brain Liberal piece of nonsense from "Gay Marriage" to "Global Warming" is making inroads in the public mind. It's propaganda out there 24-7!
The media "Air Superiority" issue is the number one thing which all of our movement ought to be focusing on solving. Yet we don't even acknowledge it as the serious problem it is.
You would think it would be obvious to everyone on our side, but it really isn't.
Thank you for your reasoned and thoughtful response.
I have my preferences, as does everyone else. I am frequently not happy with political or social outcomes. But I have to ask myself. What is wrong with a system that proposes a particular outcome via enacting laws, and then waits to see what the response will be? If there is no substantial response, is society so very wrong in adopting the law? I see this happening all the time now.
Gay marriage. I don’t like it. But did millions of people march in the street? Were there boycotts? Were sitting politicians voted out of their seats. Was there civil disobedience (more than one clerk or judge refused). No. There wasn’t. Can’t an argument be made that society has thus accepted it?
Opposition requires more than that people post on FreeRepublic and say they don’t like something. It ultimately requires being willing to put one’s reputation and resources on the line. Determining which hill is the one to die on. So far, there hasn’t been one. My guess is there won’t be one. Which is why we will slip further and further into chaos and disharmony.
But that’s just me. And I like to see the glass half full.
Everybody’s a racist. Question is,who’s racism do you want? White, black, Mexican, Asian? At least with whites, it’s been beaten into their heads that they’re racist, and they’ve been taught to try to do better. The others are unreformed and believe they’re always the victim and never the perpetrators. Then this kind of crap happens. Whites should not be voting democrat.
And you wonder why Trump is so popular?
Notice how most of the stories in the newspapers have *AP* or Associated Press at the beginning of the article. Most of the news comes through Associated Press. They can keep some stories local by putting a journalistic *cordon sanitaire* around it guaranteeing that the story will be smothered and kept local while the stories that promote the liberal narrative are made national appearing on national television and throughout the nation’s newspapers. This is how mind control is done in a *free* nation.
Yangreek Wal got 40 years. Why can’t arseholes like this be deported? They cannot have been here that long.
Duol Wal got 30 years. The Yangreek Wal got 40 years. Peterpal Tutlam got 150 years.
Being from S. Sudan they’ll probably LOVE prison food, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.