Posted on 03/25/2016 10:47:43 AM PDT by kevcol
Roger Stone the only named source? You gotta be kidding me. Released the day after he with tiny hands tweeted the defamatory pic of Heidi like he is all that?
I am so glad I didn’t get drunk on the koolaid.
Trump is as presidential as Pee Wee Herman.
Roger Stone didn’t say he witnessed anything. His statements didn’t in any way implicate any of those ladies by name.
I have seen no evidence that Mr. Trump is responsible for this story. I have read that a Washington Times reporter claims to have knowledge of two of the women. Also, why would Mr. Trump implicate his own spokesperson?
Time will tell.
Laugh all you want. If Cruz let's this story lay out there without suing NE that's an admission of guilt. No matter how strenuously or frequently he denies it.
What Conduct? A Harvard lawyer claim is not proof of anything.
If this is true, then Cruz has had only 10% of the number of mistresses that Trump has had. Cruz needs to get busy!
Seriously though, the National Enquirer doesn't even go so far as to allege that any of the claims are true. They just "report" that someone else (they won't say who) has put together a "dirt file" against Cruz in which the claims are made.
In other breaking news, News of the World reports that someone (they won't say who) has put together a dirt file that contains a claim that Donald Trump had sex with Bat Boy.
Mob stuff supposedly coming on Trump.
But anyone who has done NY real estate had to deal with the Mob, they ran the concrete cartel.
Mob stuff supposedly coming on Trump.
But anyone who has done NY real estate had to deal with the Mob, they ran the concrete cartel.
My experience is that when a person tell me:
1. he is “smart, very smart”, he is not at all smart.
2. everyone else is a liar, he is the one who is the innate liar.
3. he does not need the counsel of other people because he is smarter than everyone else, he is a person with a IQ not that much above room temperature.
As Mr. T. would say, “T.Rump is a foo’!” and would probably add “An’ a liar too!”
You cant prove Trump directed anyone to do such a thing.
ON the other hand, Cruzs team on video/audio conspired to smear Melania
Talk about that which can’t be proved... Damn, you people are hypocritical.
“making absolute enemies out of your primary opponents will only ensure a complete loss.
I actually have more abject disgust for Trump than any other candidate ever.”
Oh. The. Irony.
I keep reminding myself to keep the sarcasm tag to a font still readable, I’m sorry for causing you confusion.
Looks like St Ted's halo is a little tarnished. He's no better than Jimmy Swaggart.
Dittos to what you wrote.
Actually the Evidence is the Cruz spokesperson on Fox Business using the same talking points and terms as the ad from 2 weeks before the ad ran. There is video on FR about it.
At this stage of a story, the only reasonable expectation and reaction is denials all around! What is Enquirer going to do about that? Sue them? Even if one of them steps away from denial, it is a game of numbers and credibility, if all the rest stick to the "denial" script (which might be the truth).
“It may or may not put it back on Trump but he is a well-known TRUMP HACK.”
Maybe so,,but did Stone lie? Point out the lie.
Haven't I heard all these denials before?
Hmmm... Thinking...thinking...thinking...
Yah know, the National Enquirer probably spends half it's budget on anti slander lawyers, and vets it's stories WAY more than the regular media.
Just saying...
Didn’t Trump already fire Roger Stone, a long time ago?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.