Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

Fund makes a terrible propagandist, and that’s basically all he is being here.

He implies the rules have been the same over 100 years. FAIL!

The RNC has tinkered with the rules to the point it’s very difficult to obtain the required 1237 delegates. The party wanted control. They didn’t want a rogue. They thought they had rigged it to prevent a Trump. Guess again.

Then to openly make public comments about a candidate trying to get the public to flee from supporting them? Talk of running a third party. Hold secret meetings to destroy a candidate? Real fair Mr. Fund.

As for people who voted in the minority for also ran candidates, it’s absurd to compare them to the majority who voted for the guy with a vast lead on his nearest competitor.

Would Fund also want us to think those who voted for Romney against Obama in 2012 and lost, are also disenfranchised?

Voters may not like it that their candidate didn’t win, but they don’t come away thinking they were disenfranchised. They come away thinking their guy didn’t attract the voters he needed. Duh!

Go suck a rotten egg Fund.


28 posted on 03/20/2016 7:13:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
That was remarkably more thoughtful than my response.

I just couldn't justify the effort for John Fund, a transparent fraud.

There are indigenous Yukon hunter gathers that posses more analytical horse power than John Fund could ever hope to muster. Down on their luck tilt-a-whirl operators run circles around John Fund. Even the ones with bad skin. At least they apply creams and antibiotics whereas John Fund goes to bed with cheesy poof remnants between his teeth and in his hair.

40 posted on 03/20/2016 7:24:28 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Wow! You're getting almost as nasty as the one you've given your allegiance to who has a bad habbit of calling his leading challenger "nasty!"

Nothing more foul than a rotten sucky egg, unless it's the one telling one to suck one!!!

This whole campaign has turned infinitely infantile to the nth degree!!!

Could it be that your fearless leader's nastiness has had a DetriMental effect on your disposition???

56 posted on 03/20/2016 7:53:45 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Hey, lets leap to support someone rich and strong enough who will DO SOMETHING, (even if its wrong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson