Voting for the Corker Bill is falling in with the crowd, and voting for the Corker Bill is not something a constitutional conservative would do.
I don’t believe he is who he pretends to be.
On top of that, he’s really not likable at all. In fact, he’s easily disliked, if not down right detestable.
Sorry, but I don’t want him as my president.
At this point Cruz is just the latest shill for the globalist GOP party bosses that have been screwing us over. He can’t win a majority of the delegates, and his only role is to block the first nationalist candidate since Reagan. That’s why Linsay Graham is on board. If they keep Trump from a majority they’ll give it to Kasich, Ryan or Romney, bank on it.
Sadly, Ted Cruz is in that category.
I’ll pass on some excellent advice I’ve received in my military career: You do you.
"Constitutional candidate"? Ted Cruz is not even eligible according to our Constitution. See Article II, Sec. 1, Clause 5.
I’ll vote for Cruz or trump . And , yes , all the vitriol for conservatives is disgusting . But what really ticks me off is there is no longer any “ news” at FR . Just fighting .
Question: Who better to clean it up than the one who has utilized the process and knows how it works, who is causing the stink?
There's an old adage, 'it takes a thief to catch one'.
Meaning, once again the person who knows how the problem works is the one to eliminate the problem.
Oh yeah, he's a known liar to boot!
Game-Set-Match ;-)
Full disclosure: I'm not a Republican (Burnt my card years ago), Democrat, Conservative and/or Populist.
I'm an A-M-E-R-I-C-A-N that knows that the USofA was created under Natural Law to be a Democratic Republic .
I realize most of you don't have a clear grasp on the concept, so I refer you to the source:
The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions. ~ John Locke 1690
Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience. ~ John Locke 1690
Trump is the only candidate that isn't for sale to the highest bidder, and is the only one calling a spade-a-spade.
Let's hope he makes it, because without a reset things are about to get interesting...
The constitutional conservative voting for TPA which ensured TPP would happen? The Constitutional conservative down at the border handing out soccer balls to invading Mexicans?
He isn’t the second Reagan. At best he is just another politician, beholden to Goldman Sachs, who will break our way most times.
But he isn’t as effective of a leader as Trump.
Whoa is me?
Yep, thanks for your POV, I agree.
When I see someone post that Cruz is not conservative, it makes me cringe. Perfect, of course not, nobody is, but about as close as one is going to see now days.
Your guy may be a rebel or a maverick in the Senate, but for a lot of voters he is -- as a grad of two Ivy League schools, a Senator, the husband of an investment banker, and a former Supreme Court law clerk, corporate lawyer and government regulator -- the embodiment of the Establishment.
That's not to say that the other guy isn't in some sense Establishment as well, but Ted should have recognized going in that there was only so far the anti-elitist line would get him before it started to hurt his chances.
Ditto for the National Review boys. Guys, if anybody is part of the Washington Establishment, you are.
The issue is no longer conservatism versus liberalism. Thanks to the globalists pushing too far and too rapidly, it’s now globalism versus nationalism.
You’re bemoaning the same situation that many have been bemoaning since the ascendance of Trump is this campaign. Three of the biggest issues in this campaign, issues that concern a big swath of Americans more than any others, simply do not fit neatly into any definition of conservatism, or liberalism, or anything else.
And those issues are immigration, trade and foreign policy. But, if there is a perfect, pure conservative position for each of those, by all means enlighten the world with your wisdom.
If you’ve been gone for awhile, pull up a chair and see what has been going on.
There is much more going on in the USA than just a struggle between Libs and Conservatives.
First lesson, Jeb is gone, Rubio is gone and the ruling portion of the GOP is struggling to stay in power.
If you can accept that, you will feel comfortable with the new FR.
If you are here to promote the Old Guard, the greatness of the Bush Family, you might want to turn tail fast.
Just some very friendly advice.
Oh smack me in the face and call me stupid, then you want me to vote for YOUR candidate, since I’m too stupid to have an opinion - yeah that’s rich.
MY CRITERIA: someone that has signed a paycheck on the FRONT and there are only 2 standing that have done that and it ain’t your guy that’s included.
Sorry that I just ain’t as smart and intellygent as U R.
Ted Cruz is not, I repeat NOT, a constitutional conservative. Only low info voters think he is a constitutional conservative simply because that is what he calls himself. High info voters have looked at his record and decided he is a GOPe uniparty globalist hack.
Disagreeing that Cruz is the best candidate is not “hate”.
Please do not be like some liberals, who label disagreement with their world-views to be “hate”.