Posted on 03/17/2016 3:13:11 PM PDT by katwoman5779
He’s not my president. I didn’t vote for the bum.
Poll | Date | Sample |
Favorable
|
Unfavorable
|
Spread |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCP Average | 2/2 - 3/12 | -- | 32.5 | 61.0 | -28.5 |
The Economist/YouGovThe Economist/YouGov | 3/10 - 3/12 | 2000 A | 36 | 61 | -25 |
ABC News/Wash PostABC News/Wash Post | 3/3 - 3/6 | 1000 A | 30 | 67 | -37 |
GallupGallup | 2/26 - 3/3 | A | 30 | 63 | -33 |
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC | 2/24 - 2/27 | 920 RV | 37 | 60 | -23 |
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC News/Wall St. Jrnl | 2/14 - 2/16 | 800 RV | 28 | 59 | -31 |
Associated Press-GfKAssociated Press-GfK | 2/11 - 2/15 | 1033 A | 32 | 58 | -26 |
QuinnipiacQuinnipiac | 2/10 - 2/15 | 1342 RV | 37 | 57 | -20 |
PPP (D)PPP (D) | 2/2 - 2/3 | 1236 RV | 30 | 63 | -33 |
My impression from reading FreeRepublic over the years, is that at least half the people who would define themselves as strong conservatives just pine for a return to the 1950's. Probably mostly related to demographics and social issues, but also back to a time before the rest of the world caught up to the US in education and technology.
Of course, imagining a return to the past would also put us at a point where illegal immigration, trade, and foreign policy weren't issues you used in choosing which candidate to vote for.
Free Republic has never suppported the GOP candidate.
Bunch of crap! That line is getting old!
You may believe that, but the Canadian Citizenship Act that governs this was passed in 1947. What is your “belief” based on?
I don’t need you to send me your garbage.
I can find more statistical garbage on the internet than I could ever care to.
Don’t post this crap to me again.
FR is dead. RIP. I miss the old days.
That fact that he held dual citizenship says everything you need to know about his eligibility, or lack there of.
It is the Cruz supporters who spam FR with meaningless, wishful-thinking, unrealistic spam about how Cruz can win; emphasizing victories in small, GOP-only caucus states over major unexpected victories by Trump in what was supposed to be Cruz's home turf...winning in all demographics.
It is the Cruz supporters who echoed the RINO insults of Trump supporters as blue collar, unemployed, losers or crypto-racists.
They are only getting their own back returned with compound interest.
Moveon.org, Bill Ayers, Anonymous, Illegals, REVCOM, MSM, CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX, BLM, MsNBC, and Harry Reid all stand with you against Trump!
Oh yeah, you got Lindsey Graham too.
Spoken like a Trump bot.
So what if Trump changed his mind since four hears ago?
At least he was not a Canadian citizen four years ago like your beta male boy, Teddy!
hear=here
I can find more statistical garbage on the internet than I could ever care to.
Dont post this crap to me again.
In other words:
“A few of a half dozen reasons I switched from preferring Cruz to preferring Trump was his projection of strength, his ability to form a narrative above the heads of the media, and his willingness to face down the whining, moronic leftists and win.
No one else in the race can do what he’s doing without being destroyed by the left (as well as the turncoats in the GOP).”
I, too, switched from Cruz to Trump, for those, and the aforementioned half dozen other reasons. The first thing that froze me in my tracks, was Ted’s parliamentary trickery on TPA/TPP. Later, his affirmative vote for the Corker amendment shut the door. Since then there’s been one revelation after another that have validated my loss of trust in Ted.
In the meantime, I haven’t seen or heard a single thing that diminished my trust or respect for Trump. I remain convinced that he’s in this thing to do what he says: Make America Great Again.
Congrats!
Multiple citizenship (dual) not legal until 1977.
Canadian nationality law was substantially revised again on 15 February 1977, when the new “Citizenship Act” came into force. From that date, multiple citizenship became legal. However, those who had lost Canadian citizenship before that date did not automatically have it restored until 17 April 2009, when Bill C-37 became law.[5] The 2009 act, the most recent major change to laws governing Canadian citizenship, limited the issuance of citizenship to children born outside Canada to Canadian ancestors (jus sanguinis) to one generation abroad.[6]
Birth in Canada[edit]
In general, everyone born in Canada from 1947 or later acquires Canadian citizenship at birth. In one 2008 case, a girl born to a Ugandan mother aboard a Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Boston was deemed a Canadian citizen for customs purposes because she was born over Canada’s airspace.[7]
The only exceptions concern children born to diplomats, where additional requirements apply.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_nationality_law
Please explain the fact that Hillary wins in nearly EVERY SINGLE poll of dozens vs. Trump. In many she wins by a margin that would be a historic win of the Democrats and not only win the Senate for them (which was almost certain anyway) but also deliver the House.
A vote for Trump is a vote for a permanent Democratic majority for decades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.