It also says why the other candidate blew it, and why he's undeserving in spite of originally having the bullet points in a row. That you don't understand how he betrayed his own supposed principles, and his supporters is a bit telling.
Perhaps you could address that.
But you said that it didn't say that.
You may let el Supremo get away with saying one thing and then saying the diametric opposite a few days or hours later. But you won't get away with that with me.