Right about what? That Trump DESERVES to have people literally ATTACK HIM at rallies?
__________________________________________
That when you talk about hitting people who disagree with you, when you offer to pay legal expenses for followers who assault others, when your response to a follower sucker punching another person ( knock out game anyone) is to say you have people looking into paying for his defense.
You are going to attract a certain kind of person.
The people at Trump’s rally weren’t the law-breakers/rioters. It was BLM—the same group that burned Ferguson—La Rasa, communists, anarchists, and other assorted anti-American leftists. Trump didn’t radicalize a single one of them.
Btw, Bill Ayers was there too. Did Trump radicalize him, too?
Exactly Leto. I hope the TV Star supporters have seen this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfw7LSdJI3U
“That when you talk about hitting people who disagree with you, when you offer to pay legal expenses for followers who assault others, when your response to a follower sucker punching another person ( knock out game anyone) is to say you have people looking into paying for his defense.”
THAT DEPENDS. Trump was VERY CLEAR that if the Disrupter INSTIGATED the punch, then Trump will support.
What you NEED TO UNDERSTAND is that while people have the right to disagree, and to protest (peacefully), THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISRUPT a political event, no more than any conservative has “the right” in the audience has the right to get up and START SCREAMING during Obama’s State of the Unions...even if many have wanted to.
How many of these “sorts of people” has he attracted so far...that one 78 year old guy?
Meanwhile the left has dozens if not hundreds if not thousands of followers willing to go out and disrupt.
It’s the total lack of perspective in placing the blame that is so galling. The left always gets a pass. And here we have Ted Cruz, the conservative mastermind, helping prop up the double standard.