“That when you talk about hitting people who disagree with you, when you offer to pay legal expenses for followers who assault others, when your response to a follower sucker punching another person ( knock out game anyone) is to say you have people looking into paying for his defense.”
THAT DEPENDS. Trump was VERY CLEAR that if the Disrupter INSTIGATED the punch, then Trump will support.
What you NEED TO UNDERSTAND is that while people have the right to disagree, and to protest (peacefully), THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISRUPT a political event, no more than any conservative has “the right” in the audience has the right to get up and START SCREAMING during Obama’s State of the Unions...even if many have wanted to.
What you NEED TO UNDERSTAND is that while people have the right to disagree, and to protest (peacefully), THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISRUPT a political event, no more than any conservative has “the right” in the audience has the right to get up and START SCREAMING during Obama’s State of the Unions...even if many have wanted to.
____________________________________________
That is correct.
Too bad the candidate gave them political cover by muddying the waters with his rhetoric over a period of months.